Balancing between Legitimacy and Distinctiveness in Corporate Messaging: A Case Study in the Oil Industry
This paper shows how 6 large oil companies express their identity by using 2 messaging patterns in managing legitimacy and distinctiveness. In the first pattern (aiming at legitimacy), companies focus on transparency, sincerity and consistency to build understanding and acceptance among stakeholders...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Corporate reputation review 2011-12, Vol.14 (4), p.273-299 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper shows how 6 large oil companies express their identity by using 2 messaging patterns in managing legitimacy and distinctiveness. In the first pattern (aiming at legitimacy), companies focus on transparency, sincerity and consistency to build understanding and acceptance among stakeholders. In the second pattern (aimed at distinctiveness) companies take a more provocative standpoint in a public debate to facilitate competitive advantage. We develop a theoretical framework and propositions explaining
when
and
how
oil companies adopt 1 of the 2 patterns depending on their existing reputation, experienced institutional pressures
and
their organizational identity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1363-3589 1479-1889 |
DOI: | 10.1057/crr.2011.19 |