Pedagogical Eclecticism
Eclecticism is no "terminus technicus" of pedagogy, as defined in a relevant lexicon, but it repeatedly appears in educational discussions. The contribution on hand is an attempt to define the eclectic approach as an important pedagogical approach. Therefor this article will make four argu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of educational thought 2011-04, Vol.45 (1), p.3-19 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Journal of educational thought |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | ZIERER, KLAUS |
description | Eclecticism is no "terminus technicus" of pedagogy, as defined in a relevant lexicon, but it repeatedly appears in educational discussions. The contribution on hand is an attempt to define the eclectic approach as an important pedagogical approach. Therefor this article will make four arguments: First, I want to think about the term "eclecticism." Second, I will present a historical review on the "eclectic idea," including a framework of eclecticism. Third, I will pick up on modern theories of eclecticism as they relate to the framework eclecticism. Fourth and finally, I will summarize my main thoughts and draw some conclusions arising from this analysis. L'éclectisme n'est pas un "terminus technicus" (un terme technique) pédagogique comme le précise un lexique pertinent. Pourtant, c'est ce qui émane constamment des discussions sur l'enseignement. La participation active est une façon d'expliquer l'approche éclectique en tant que démarche importante pédagogique. Cette étude fera donc l'objet de quatre points. Le premier: je veux réfléchir sur le terme 'éclectisme'. Le deuxième: je dépeindrai un tableau historique sur "l'idée éclectique" dont une structure de l'éclectisme. Le troisième: je recueillerai des théories modernes sur l'éclectisme qui se rapportent à la structure de l'éclectisme. Et enfin, le quatrième: "je résumerai mes idées principales et tirerai des conclusions à partir de cette analyse." |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_896732070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23765440</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23765440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j119t-bd9d755fa3d9615ede4e976458a3d59386a2228230f0242c749a1caea36859f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjs1LAzEUxEOx0LV69iSI90DykrzkHaXUDyjoQc9LmmTLLlu3JtuD_72BOpeB4cfMLFgDBiW3ROKKNUIAcGGFXLHrUgZRZRAbdveRoj9Mhz748WEbxhTmPvTleMOWnR9Luv33Nft63n5uXvnu_eVt87Tjg5Q0832kaI3pvIqE0qSYdCKL2riaGFIOPQA4UKIToCFYTV4Gn7xCZ6iTas0eL72nPP2cU5nbYTrn7zrZOkKroH6u0P0FGso85faU-6PPvy0oi0Zrof4ArTU_mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896732070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pedagogical Eclecticism</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>ZIERER, KLAUS</creator><creatorcontrib>ZIERER, KLAUS</creatorcontrib><description>Eclecticism is no "terminus technicus" of pedagogy, as defined in a relevant lexicon, but it repeatedly appears in educational discussions. The contribution on hand is an attempt to define the eclectic approach as an important pedagogical approach. Therefor this article will make four arguments: First, I want to think about the term "eclecticism." Second, I will present a historical review on the "eclectic idea," including a framework of eclecticism. Third, I will pick up on modern theories of eclecticism as they relate to the framework eclecticism. Fourth and finally, I will summarize my main thoughts and draw some conclusions arising from this analysis. L'éclectisme n'est pas un "terminus technicus" (un terme technique) pédagogique comme le précise un lexique pertinent. Pourtant, c'est ce qui émane constamment des discussions sur l'enseignement. La participation active est une façon d'expliquer l'approche éclectique en tant que démarche importante pédagogique. Cette étude fera donc l'objet de quatre points. Le premier: je veux réfléchir sur le terme 'éclectisme'. Le deuxième: je dépeindrai un tableau historique sur "l'idée éclectique" dont une structure de l'éclectisme. Le troisième: je recueillerai des théories modernes sur l'éclectisme qui se rapportent à la structure de l'éclectisme. Et enfin, le quatrième: "je résumerai mes idées principales et tirerai des conclusions à partir de cette analyse."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2561-7990</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEDTAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary: Faculty of Education, University of Calgary</publisher><subject>Argumentation ; Christianity ; Educational philosophy ; Educational Principles ; Educational theory ; Ethical Instruction ; Humans ; Judgment ; Multidisciplinary treatment ; Niemeyer, August Hermann ; Pedagogy ; Phenomenology ; Reason ; Scientific method ; Socratic philosophy ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational thought, 2011-04, Vol.45 (1), p.3-19</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Calgary, Faculty of Education Spring 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23765440$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23765440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZIERER, KLAUS</creatorcontrib><title>Pedagogical Eclecticism</title><title>Journal of educational thought</title><description>Eclecticism is no "terminus technicus" of pedagogy, as defined in a relevant lexicon, but it repeatedly appears in educational discussions. The contribution on hand is an attempt to define the eclectic approach as an important pedagogical approach. Therefor this article will make four arguments: First, I want to think about the term "eclecticism." Second, I will present a historical review on the "eclectic idea," including a framework of eclecticism. Third, I will pick up on modern theories of eclecticism as they relate to the framework eclecticism. Fourth and finally, I will summarize my main thoughts and draw some conclusions arising from this analysis. L'éclectisme n'est pas un "terminus technicus" (un terme technique) pédagogique comme le précise un lexique pertinent. Pourtant, c'est ce qui émane constamment des discussions sur l'enseignement. La participation active est une façon d'expliquer l'approche éclectique en tant que démarche importante pédagogique. Cette étude fera donc l'objet de quatre points. Le premier: je veux réfléchir sur le terme 'éclectisme'. Le deuxième: je dépeindrai un tableau historique sur "l'idée éclectique" dont une structure de l'éclectisme. Le troisième: je recueillerai des théories modernes sur l'éclectisme qui se rapportent à la structure de l'éclectisme. Et enfin, le quatrième: "je résumerai mes idées principales et tirerai des conclusions à partir de cette analyse."</description><subject>Argumentation</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Educational philosophy</subject><subject>Educational Principles</subject><subject>Educational theory</subject><subject>Ethical Instruction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary treatment</subject><subject>Niemeyer, August Hermann</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Reason</subject><subject>Scientific method</subject><subject>Socratic philosophy</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>0022-0701</issn><issn>2561-7990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjs1LAzEUxEOx0LV69iSI90DykrzkHaXUDyjoQc9LmmTLLlu3JtuD_72BOpeB4cfMLFgDBiW3ROKKNUIAcGGFXLHrUgZRZRAbdveRoj9Mhz748WEbxhTmPvTleMOWnR9Luv33Nft63n5uXvnu_eVt87Tjg5Q0832kaI3pvIqE0qSYdCKL2riaGFIOPQA4UKIToCFYTV4Gn7xCZ6iTas0eL72nPP2cU5nbYTrn7zrZOkKroH6u0P0FGso85faU-6PPvy0oi0Zrof4ArTU_mw</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>ZIERER, KLAUS</creator><general>Faculty of Education, University of Calgary</general><general>University of Calgary, Faculty of Education</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Pedagogical Eclecticism</title><author>ZIERER, KLAUS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j119t-bd9d755fa3d9615ede4e976458a3d59386a2228230f0242c749a1caea36859f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Argumentation</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Educational philosophy</topic><topic>Educational Principles</topic><topic>Educational theory</topic><topic>Ethical Instruction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary treatment</topic><topic>Niemeyer, August Hermann</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Reason</topic><topic>Scientific method</topic><topic>Socratic philosophy</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZIERER, KLAUS</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational thought</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZIERER, KLAUS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pedagogical Eclecticism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational thought</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>3-19</pages><issn>0022-0701</issn><eissn>2561-7990</eissn><coden>JEDTAV</coden><abstract>Eclecticism is no "terminus technicus" of pedagogy, as defined in a relevant lexicon, but it repeatedly appears in educational discussions. The contribution on hand is an attempt to define the eclectic approach as an important pedagogical approach. Therefor this article will make four arguments: First, I want to think about the term "eclecticism." Second, I will present a historical review on the "eclectic idea," including a framework of eclecticism. Third, I will pick up on modern theories of eclecticism as they relate to the framework eclecticism. Fourth and finally, I will summarize my main thoughts and draw some conclusions arising from this analysis. L'éclectisme n'est pas un "terminus technicus" (un terme technique) pédagogique comme le précise un lexique pertinent. Pourtant, c'est ce qui émane constamment des discussions sur l'enseignement. La participation active est une façon d'expliquer l'approche éclectique en tant que démarche importante pédagogique. Cette étude fera donc l'objet de quatre points. Le premier: je veux réfléchir sur le terme 'éclectisme'. Le deuxième: je dépeindrai un tableau historique sur "l'idée éclectique" dont une structure de l'éclectisme. Le troisième: je recueillerai des théories modernes sur l'éclectisme qui se rapportent à la structure de l'éclectisme. Et enfin, le quatrième: "je résumerai mes idées principales et tirerai des conclusions à partir de cette analyse."</abstract><cop>Calgary</cop><pub>Faculty of Education, University of Calgary</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0701 |
ispartof | Journal of educational thought, 2011-04, Vol.45 (1), p.3-19 |
issn | 0022-0701 2561-7990 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_896732070 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source |
subjects | Argumentation Christianity Educational philosophy Educational Principles Educational theory Ethical Instruction Humans Judgment Multidisciplinary treatment Niemeyer, August Hermann Pedagogy Phenomenology Reason Scientific method Socratic philosophy Teaching methods |
title | Pedagogical Eclecticism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A53%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pedagogical%20Eclecticism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20thought&rft.au=ZIERER,%20KLAUS&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=3-19&rft.issn=0022-0701&rft.eissn=2561-7990&rft.coden=JEDTAV&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23765440%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896732070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23765440&rfr_iscdi=true |