Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework
The restructuring of the electricity industry has spawned the introduction of new independent grid operators (IGOs), typically called transmission system operators (TSOs); independent system operator (ISOs); or regional transmission organizations (RTOs), in various parts of the world. An important t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power systems 2003-02, Vol.18 (1), p.346-352 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 352 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 346 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on power systems |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Bompard, E. Correia, P. Gross, G. Amelin, M. |
| description | The restructuring of the electricity industry has spawned the introduction of new independent grid operators (IGOs), typically called transmission system operators (TSOs); independent system operator (ISOs); or regional transmission organizations (RTOs), in various parts of the world. An important task of an IGO is congestion management (CM) and pricing. This activity has significant economic implications on every market participant in the IGO's region. The paper briefly reviews the CM schemes and the associated pricing mechanism used by the IGOs in five representative schemes. These were selected to illustrate the various CM approaches in use: England and Wales, Norway, Sweden, PJM, and California. The authors develop a unified framework for the mathematical representation of the market dispatch and redispatch problems that the IGO must solve in CM in these various jurisdictions. They use this unified framework to develop meaningful metrics to compare the various CM approaches so as to assess their efficiency and the effectiveness of the market signals provided to the market participants. They compare, using a small test system, side by side, the performance of these schemes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807077 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_884252536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1178818</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>901688091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5d94f1f6b9297d889f7b8d7949451acf1b0329021f65143286f81ea012f1d4e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmCrAqlL4QdUXKIe4EK2M04cj3urlk-pUiso9Gh5E3vrdhMvdkLVf4-XIJA4cLKleWbk8cvYMcISEdTp9dXN5y9LDsCXBBKkPGALFIJKaKR6whZAJEpSAg7Zs5TuAKDJhQW7XIVhY9Pow1D2ZjAb29thLFJ7my_prDBFG_qdiWb0P2yRwfYx-VRMQ2djLk6Dd952hYumtw8h3j9nT53ZJvvi93nEvr5_d736WF5cfvi0Or8o20rBWIpO1Q5ds1ZcyY5IObmmTqpa1QJN63ANFVfAMxFYV5waR2gNIHfY1ZZXR-zNPDc92N201rvoexMfdTBev_XfznWIG30_3mrOea0yfz3zXQzfp7yv7n1q7XZrBhumpBVgQwQKs3z1X8mJo0Tcjzz5B96FKeYPSpqo5oKLqskIZ9TGkFK07s9DEfQ-OP0rOL0PTs_B5Z6Xc4-31v71KImQqp8Q65Pq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884252536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Bompard, E. ; Correia, P. ; Gross, G. ; Amelin, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bompard, E. ; Correia, P. ; Gross, G. ; Amelin, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The restructuring of the electricity industry has spawned the introduction of new independent grid operators (IGOs), typically called transmission system operators (TSOs); independent system operator (ISOs); or regional transmission organizations (RTOs), in various parts of the world. An important task of an IGO is congestion management (CM) and pricing. This activity has significant economic implications on every market participant in the IGO's region. The paper briefly reviews the CM schemes and the associated pricing mechanism used by the IGOs in five representative schemes. These were selected to illustrate the various CM approaches in use: England and Wales, Norway, Sweden, PJM, and California. The authors develop a unified framework for the mathematical representation of the market dispatch and redispatch problems that the IGO must solve in CM in these various jurisdictions. They use this unified framework to develop meaningful metrics to compare the various CM approaches so as to assess their efficiency and the effectiveness of the market signals provided to the market participants. They compare, using a small test system, side by side, the performance of these schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Company structure ; Computing time ; congestion management and pricing ; congestion redispatch ; Control systems ; economic signals ; Economics ; Electric power generation ; Electric utilities ; Energy management ; Independent system operators ; Jurisdiction ; Load flow ; market dispatch ; Markets ; Operators ; optimum power flow ; Power engineering and energy ; Power generation economics ; Power system economics ; Power system management ; Power systems ; Pricing ; System testing ; transmission congestion</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2003-02, Vol.18 (1), p.346-352</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5d94f1f6b9297d889f7b8d7949451acf1b0329021f65143286f81ea012f1d4e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5d94f1f6b9297d889f7b8d7949451acf1b0329021f65143286f81ea012f1d4e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1178818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,796,885,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1178818$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-22249$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bompard, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amelin, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>The restructuring of the electricity industry has spawned the introduction of new independent grid operators (IGOs), typically called transmission system operators (TSOs); independent system operator (ISOs); or regional transmission organizations (RTOs), in various parts of the world. An important task of an IGO is congestion management (CM) and pricing. This activity has significant economic implications on every market participant in the IGO's region. The paper briefly reviews the CM schemes and the associated pricing mechanism used by the IGOs in five representative schemes. These were selected to illustrate the various CM approaches in use: England and Wales, Norway, Sweden, PJM, and California. The authors develop a unified framework for the mathematical representation of the market dispatch and redispatch problems that the IGO must solve in CM in these various jurisdictions. They use this unified framework to develop meaningful metrics to compare the various CM approaches so as to assess their efficiency and the effectiveness of the market signals provided to the market participants. They compare, using a small test system, side by side, the performance of these schemes.</description><subject>Company structure</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>congestion management and pricing</subject><subject>congestion redispatch</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>economic signals</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Independent system operators</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Load flow</subject><subject>market dispatch</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Operators</subject><subject>optimum power flow</subject><subject>Power engineering and energy</subject><subject>Power generation economics</subject><subject>Power system economics</subject><subject>Power system management</subject><subject>Power systems</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>System testing</subject><subject>transmission congestion</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmCrAqlL4QdUXKIe4EK2M04cj3urlk-pUiso9Gh5E3vrdhMvdkLVf4-XIJA4cLKleWbk8cvYMcISEdTp9dXN5y9LDsCXBBKkPGALFIJKaKR6whZAJEpSAg7Zs5TuAKDJhQW7XIVhY9Pow1D2ZjAb29thLFJ7my_prDBFG_qdiWb0P2yRwfYx-VRMQ2djLk6Dd952hYumtw8h3j9nT53ZJvvi93nEvr5_d736WF5cfvi0Or8o20rBWIpO1Q5ds1ZcyY5IObmmTqpa1QJN63ANFVfAMxFYV5waR2gNIHfY1ZZXR-zNPDc92N201rvoexMfdTBev_XfznWIG30_3mrOea0yfz3zXQzfp7yv7n1q7XZrBhumpBVgQwQKs3z1X8mJo0Tcjzz5B96FKeYPSpqo5oKLqskIZ9TGkFK07s9DEfQ-OP0rOL0PTs_B5Z6Xc4-31v71KImQqp8Q65Pq</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Bompard, E.</creator><creator>Correia, P.</creator><creator>Gross, G.</creator><creator>Amelin, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8V</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework</title><author>Bompard, E. ; Correia, P. ; Gross, G. ; Amelin, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5d94f1f6b9297d889f7b8d7949451acf1b0329021f65143286f81ea012f1d4e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Company structure</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>congestion management and pricing</topic><topic>congestion redispatch</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>economic signals</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Independent system operators</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Load flow</topic><topic>market dispatch</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Operators</topic><topic>optimum power flow</topic><topic>Power engineering and energy</topic><topic>Power generation economics</topic><topic>Power system economics</topic><topic>Power system management</topic><topic>Power systems</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>System testing</topic><topic>transmission congestion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bompard, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amelin, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bompard, E.</au><au>Correia, P.</au><au>Gross, G.</au><au>Amelin, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>346-352</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>The restructuring of the electricity industry has spawned the introduction of new independent grid operators (IGOs), typically called transmission system operators (TSOs); independent system operator (ISOs); or regional transmission organizations (RTOs), in various parts of the world. An important task of an IGO is congestion management (CM) and pricing. This activity has significant economic implications on every market participant in the IGO's region. The paper briefly reviews the CM schemes and the associated pricing mechanism used by the IGOs in five representative schemes. These were selected to illustrate the various CM approaches in use: England and Wales, Norway, Sweden, PJM, and California. The authors develop a unified framework for the mathematical representation of the market dispatch and redispatch problems that the IGO must solve in CM in these various jurisdictions. They use this unified framework to develop meaningful metrics to compare the various CM approaches so as to assess their efficiency and the effectiveness of the market signals provided to the market participants. They compare, using a small test system, side by side, the performance of these schemes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807077</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0885-8950 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on power systems, 2003-02, Vol.18 (1), p.346-352 |
| issn | 0885-8950 1558-0679 1558-0679 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_884252536 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Company structure Computing time congestion management and pricing congestion redispatch Control systems economic signals Economics Electric power generation Electric utilities Energy management Independent system operators Jurisdiction Load flow market dispatch Markets Operators optimum power flow Power engineering and energy Power generation economics Power system economics Power system management Power systems Pricing System testing transmission congestion |
| title | Congestion-management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A01%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Congestion-management%20schemes:%20a%20comparative%20analysis%20under%20a%20unified%20framework&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Bompard,%20E.&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=346-352&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E901688091%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884252536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1178818&rfr_iscdi=true |