SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS AND IMMUNITY
Lane and Liang talk about Sydney Shoemaker's articulation of the idea that a person is "immune to error through misidentification relative to the first-person pronouns" that contributes to the understanding of self-consciousness. They adhere to the distinction between self-as-subject...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of philosophy 2011-02, Vol.108 (2), p.78-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Lane and Liang talk about Sydney Shoemaker's articulation of the idea that a person is "immune to error through misidentification relative to the first-person pronouns" that contributes to the understanding of self-consciousness. They adhere to the distinction between self-as-subject and self-as-object. According to Shoemaker, "absolute" immunity applies to self-attribution of mental states only as regards the former. What they have discovered is that, even when concerned exclusively with self-as-subject, they are not necessarily immune to error in the way that Shoemaker claims. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-362X 1939-8549 |
DOI: | 10.5840/jphil201110824 |