Bimonthly 24 h Infusion of High-Dose 5-Fluorouracil vs EAP Regimen in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Study
Background : To investigate the activity and toxicity of high dose (HD) infusional 5-FU in comparison to EAP regimen as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and methods : Histologically confirmed measurable advanced gastric cancer, age < 72 yr, ECOG performan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) London, England), 2008-03, Vol.25 (1), p.73-80 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
: To investigate the activity and toxicity of high dose (HD) infusional 5-FU in comparison to EAP regimen as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Patients and methods
: Histologically confirmed measurable advanced gastric cancer, age < 72 yr, ECOG performance status 0–2, no prior chemo- and radiotherapy, adequate organ functions. Treatment: EAP arm: doxorubicin (40 mg/m
2
), etoposide (360 mg/m
2
), and cisplatin (80 mg/m
2
) every 28 d; HD 5-FU arm: 5-FU 2.6 g/m
2
24 h infusion, biweekly.
Results
: Sixty patients were randomized. Patient characteristics (arms EAP/HD 5-FU): Median age 57/55 yr, median PS 1/1, LAD (patients) 3/8, M1 (patients) 27/22. Median number of cycles (range): EAP arm 4 (2–8), HD 5-FU arm 2 (1–8). Worst toxicity per cycle (grade 3 and 4 in%): Neutropenia 20/3, thrombocytopenia 9/0, anemia 9/13, diarrhea 3/10, nausea 17/7, vomiting 10/0 for EAP and HD 5-FU arms, respectively. All patients were eligible for response in both arms. Confirmed response rate (95%CI): EAP arm 34% [16–50%]/HD 5-FU arm 10% (0–21%), no change: 46/40%, progression of disease: 20/50, respectively. Overall survival (range): EAP arm A 7 mo [3–27], HD 5-FU arm 6 mo (4–25).
Conclusions
: Infusional HD 5-FU showed a low incidence of severe toxicity. But given the low efficacy of 5-FU in the dosage we applied in the study, it cannot be recommended as a single treatment for further studies. Assessment of higher dose intensity and/or dose density of 5-FU, with introduction of other active drugs in combination, could be an option for further studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1357-0560 1559-131X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12032-007-0042-8 |