Wave radiation stress
There are differences in the literature concerning the vertically dependent equations that couple currents and waves. In this paper, currents are purposely omitted until the end. Isolating waves from currents allows one to focus on two main topics: an explanation of Stokes drift with apparent mean v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean dynamics 2011-05, Vol.61 (5), p.563-568 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There are differences in the literature concerning the vertically dependent equations that couple currents and waves. In this paper, currents are purposely omitted until the end. Isolating waves from currents allows one to focus on two main topics: an explanation of Stokes drift with apparent mean vorticity obtained from an otherwise irrotational flow and the determination of vertically dependent wave radiation stress which, when vertically integrated, conforms to that obtained by Longuet-Higgins and Stewart (
1964
) and Phillips (
1977
) nearly 50 years ago and, more recently, by Smith (
2006
). Discussion begins with the simple case of nonlinear flow beneath a stationary wavy wall. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1616-7341 1616-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10236-010-0359-2 |