THE MEDICAL PEER REVIEW PRIVILEGE: ILLUSTRATIVE CASES OF THE PUBLIC POLICY SUPPORTING THE PRIVILEGE AND A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO PRESENTING THE CASE FOR PROTECTION

[...] although many different approaches have been tried, the best interests of the parties and the court are served by the live testimony of the head of the committee or department, who has an intricate working knowledge of the peer review process.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Tort trial & insurance practice law journal 2010-09, Vol.46 (1), p.95-108
Hauptverfasser:	Watson, John F., Anderson, J. Matthew
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Affidavits Clinics Committees Confidential communications Court hearings & proceedings Evidence Health care Health maintenance organizations HMOs Hospitals Judges & magistrates Laws, regulations and rules Legal evidence Malpractice Medical malpractice Medical personnel Medical practice Mortality Peer review Physicians Privileges & immunities Professional standards review organizations (Medicine) Public policy Public policy (Law) Review committees Statutory law Trials
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	[...] although many different approaches have been tried, the best interests of the parties and the court are served by the live testimony of the head of the committee or department, who has an intricate working knowledge of the peer review process.
ISSN:	1543-3234 1943-118X