Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris

Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris

Every plug must find its proper place, and every case in point its appropriate normative clarification; and if it fails to do so, this can only produce a troubling lacuna with respect to the realisation of the ethico-political juridical and constitutional principles, if it is considered from the met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Iris 2009, Vol.1 (2), p.557-579
Hauptverfasser: Catania, Alfonso, Preterossi, Geminello, Costa, Pietro
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Democracy
Logic
Politics
Theory
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 579
container_issue 2
container_start_page 557
container_title Iris
container_volume 1
creator Catania, Alfonso
Preterossi, Geminello
Costa, Pietro
description Every plug must find its proper place, and every case in point its appropriate normative clarification; and if it fails to do so, this can only produce a troubling lacuna with respect to the realisation of the ethico-political juridical and constitutional principles, if it is considered from the meta-theoretical perspective of the whole coherent structure. With full awareness of the disparity between logical principles and actual law (including his principia iuris), Ferrajoli accords the normative burden to the sphere of logic in relation to the positive law of the constitutional state: the gap produced by the lack of correspondence between logic and the positive reality of law is filled by the authoritatively normative and prescriptive character of logical and meta-juridical discourses in relation to the positive ones.
doi_str_mv 10.1400/181924
format Review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_casal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_856829691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2291571661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511-39198bb40cd35ab1ddca485e2730692fc2452f104f6c8da24c955e0a260a58cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjb1OwzAURi0EElVbXoHAwhTwvf6pPaKKQqVIZege3TgJulVIgk0G3p5IZWD6znB0PiFuQD6ClvIJHHjUF2KBUtncKvSX__harFPiSoK3uPHgF-KumPiDs10TI52Gjh9S9h65DzwyZfspclqJq5a61Kz_dimOu5fj9i0vDq_77XORBwOQq7nmqkrLUCtDFdR1IO1Mgxslrcc2oDbYgtStDa4m1MEb00hCK8m4ENRS3J-zYxy-piZ9l6dhiv38WDpjHXrrYZZuz1KgRB33XI6RPyn-lKid1w7UL5eCR6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>856829691</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Catania, Alfonso ; Preterossi, Geminello ; Costa, Pietro</creator><creatorcontrib>Catania, Alfonso ; Preterossi, Geminello ; Costa, Pietro</creatorcontrib><description>Every plug must find its proper place, and every case in point its appropriate normative clarification; and if it fails to do so, this can only produce a troubling lacuna with respect to the realisation of the ethico-political juridical and constitutional principles, if it is considered from the meta-theoretical perspective of the whole coherent structure. With full awareness of the disparity between logical principles and actual law (including his principia iuris), Ferrajoli accords the normative burden to the sphere of logic in relation to the positive law of the constitutional state: the gap produced by the lack of correspondence between logic and the positive reality of law is filled by the authoritatively normative and prescriptive character of logical and meta-juridical discourses in relation to the positive ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2036-6329</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2036-3257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2036-6329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1400/181924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Firenze: Firenze University Press</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Logic ; Politics ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Iris, 2009, Vol.1 (2), p.557-579</ispartof><rights>(c) Casalini Libri, 50014 Fiesole (Italy) - www.casalini.it</rights><rights>Copyright Firenze University Press Oct 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,781,785,793,27924,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catania, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preterossi, Geminello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Pietro</creatorcontrib><title>Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris</title><title>Iris</title><description>Every plug must find its proper place, and every case in point its appropriate normative clarification; and if it fails to do so, this can only produce a troubling lacuna with respect to the realisation of the ethico-political juridical and constitutional principles, if it is considered from the meta-theoretical perspective of the whole coherent structure. With full awareness of the disparity between logical principles and actual law (including his principia iuris), Ferrajoli accords the normative burden to the sphere of logic in relation to the positive law of the constitutional state: the gap produced by the lack of correspondence between logic and the positive reality of law is filled by the authoritatively normative and prescriptive character of logical and meta-juridical discourses in relation to the positive ones.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>2036-6329</issn><issn>2036-3257</issn><issn>2036-6329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNjb1OwzAURi0EElVbXoHAwhTwvf6pPaKKQqVIZege3TgJulVIgk0G3p5IZWD6znB0PiFuQD6ClvIJHHjUF2KBUtncKvSX__harFPiSoK3uPHgF-KumPiDs10TI52Gjh9S9h65DzwyZfspclqJq5a61Kz_dimOu5fj9i0vDq_77XORBwOQq7nmqkrLUCtDFdR1IO1Mgxslrcc2oDbYgtStDa4m1MEb00hCK8m4ENRS3J-zYxy-piZ9l6dhiv38WDpjHXrrYZZuz1KgRB33XI6RPyn-lKid1w7UL5eCR6I</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Catania, Alfonso</creator><creator>Preterossi, Geminello</creator><creator>Costa, Pietro</creator><general>Firenze University Press</general><general>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris</title><author>Catania, Alfonso ; Preterossi, Geminello ; Costa, Pietro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511-39198bb40cd35ab1ddca485e2730692fc2452f104f6c8da24c955e0a260a58cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catania, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preterossi, Geminello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Pietro</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catania, Alfonso</au><au>Preterossi, Geminello</au><au>Costa, Pietro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris</atitle><jtitle>Iris</jtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>557-579</pages><issn>2036-6329</issn><issn>2036-3257</issn><eissn>2036-6329</eissn><abstract>Every plug must find its proper place, and every case in point its appropriate normative clarification; and if it fails to do so, this can only produce a troubling lacuna with respect to the realisation of the ethico-political juridical and constitutional principles, if it is considered from the meta-theoretical perspective of the whole coherent structure. With full awareness of the disparity between logical principles and actual law (including his principia iuris), Ferrajoli accords the normative burden to the sphere of logic in relation to the positive law of the constitutional state: the gap produced by the lack of correspondence between logic and the positive reality of law is filled by the authoritatively normative and prescriptive character of logical and meta-juridical discourses in relation to the positive ones.</abstract><cop>Firenze</cop><pub>Firenze University Press</pub><doi>10.1400/181924</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2036-6329
ispartof Iris, 2009, Vol.1 (2), p.557-579
issn 2036-6329
2036-3257
2036-6329
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_856829691
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Democracy
Logic
Politics
Theory
title Luigi Ferrajoli's Principia Iuris
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_casal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Luigi%20Ferrajoli's%20Principia%20Iuris&rft.jtitle=Iris&rft.au=Catania,%20Alfonso&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=557-579&rft.issn=2036-6329&rft.eissn=2036-6329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1400/181924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_casal%3E2291571661%3C/proquest_casal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856829691&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true