Invasive IPMN and MCN: Same Organ, Sifferent Outcomes?

Background The efficacy of surgery for invasive mucinous neoplasms is unclear. We examined the natural history of invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiolo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2011-02, Vol.18 (2), p.345-351
Hauptverfasser: Kargozaran, Hamed, Vu, Vu, Ray, Partha, Bagaria, Sanjay, Steen, Shawn, Ye, Xing, Gagandeep, Singh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The efficacy of surgery for invasive mucinous neoplasms is unclear. We examined the natural history of invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1996–2006) was queried for cases of resected invasive MCN and IPMN. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall survival were examined using log-rank analysis and multivariate Cox regression model. Results Of 185 MCN cases and 641 IPMN cases, 73% and 48%, respectively, were women ( P  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-010-1309-4