Invasive IPMN and MCN: Same Organ, Sifferent Outcomes?
Background The efficacy of surgery for invasive mucinous neoplasms is unclear. We examined the natural history of invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiolo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2011-02, Vol.18 (2), p.345-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The efficacy of surgery for invasive mucinous neoplasms is unclear. We examined the natural history of invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in patients who underwent pancreatic resection.
Methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1996–2006) was queried for cases of resected invasive MCN and IPMN. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall survival were examined using log-rank analysis and multivariate Cox regression model.
Results
Of 185 MCN cases and 641 IPMN cases, 73% and 48%, respectively, were women (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-010-1309-4 |