alternative method to measure carbonate in soils by FT-IR spectroscopy

Measurements of calcium carbonate contents in soils were performed with FT-IR (Fourier transform infrared) spectroscopy and with the gas volumetric Scheibler method. To the authors’ knowledge it is the first time that carbonate was quantified in soil samples by FT-IR spectroscopy. The carbonate cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental chemistry letters 2007-02, Vol.5 (1), p.9-12
Hauptverfasser: Tatzber, M, Stemmer, M, Spiegel, H, Katzlberger, C, Haberhauer, G, Gerzabek, M. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Measurements of calcium carbonate contents in soils were performed with FT-IR (Fourier transform infrared) spectroscopy and with the gas volumetric Scheibler method. To the authors’ knowledge it is the first time that carbonate was quantified in soil samples by FT-IR spectroscopy. The carbonate contents of the test soils ranged from 11.3 to 13.1%. Both methods gave similar results, however, results obtained from FT-IR spectra depend on the spectral band used for the carbonate determination. In our investigation we used the bands at 875 and 2506 cm⁻¹. In case of the band at 2506 cm⁻¹ the difference between FT-IR and Scheibler method was a factor of 1.56, in case of 875 cm⁻¹ the respective factor was 1.16. It can be concluded that FT-IR with both bands has a potential to be used in practice as substitution of the Scheibler method. The advantages of the FT-IR method are better reproducibility and the simultaneous characterization of soil organic matter in bulk samples. The disadvantage is its higher cost.
ISSN:1610-3653
1610-3661
DOI:10.1007/s10311-006-0079-5