Measures of Ordinal Association: A New Look at an Old Problem
Evidence shows that the gamma coefficient (Goodman & Kruskal, 1954) as a measure of association between two classifications either overestimated or underestimated the degree of association in the 2 × 2 case in most situations, underestimated the degree in the m × 2 ( m > 2) case, and was subj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methodology 2009, Vol.5 (4), p.112-122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evidence shows that the
gamma
coefficient (Goodman &
Kruskal, 1954) as a measure of association between two classifications either
overestimated or underestimated the degree of association in the 2 ×
2 case in most situations, underestimated the degree in the
m
× 2 (
m
> 2) case, and was subject to
restricted-range and fineness/coarseness effects. This study is to
treat the degree of association as the extent to which the percentage of
observations falling into a class on one classification can be increased by an
increase from one class to another on the other classification. A statistic
computing the relative magnitude of the percentage increase to its maximal
increase, designated as
C
p
, is ideal for measuring the degree without being contaminated by other
factors. Moreover, the value of
C
p
is accurate and stable across different portions of classification data
and free from restricted-range and fineness/coarseness effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1614-1881 1614-2241 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1614-2241.5.4.112 |