"A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931-1938": Correction to Deary, Lawn, and Bartholomew (2008)

Reports an error in "A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931-1938" by Ian J. Dreary, Martin Lawn and David J. Bartholomew ( History of Psychology, 2008[May], Vol 11[2], 122-142). The authors wou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:History of psychology 2008-08, Vol.11 (3), p.163-163
Hauptverfasser: Deary, Ian J., Lawn, Martin, Bartholomew, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reports an error in "A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931-1938" by Ian J. Dreary, Martin Lawn and David J. Bartholomew ( History of Psychology, 2008[May], Vol 11[2], 122-142). The authors would like to indicate that Charles Spearman's year of death was incorrectly reported as 1949. Spearman's correct year of death is 1945. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2008-05871-003.) Even within "an appreciation of the fundamentally social nature of scientific activity" (K. Danziger, 1990, p. 3), it is unusual to read what key scientists actually said to each other, directly or in audience. Here the authors describe, structure, illustrate, and interpret the verbatim statements made by, and a detailed conversation that took place between, Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward Thorndike within the Carnegie-funded International Examinations Inquiry meetings in 1931, 1935, and 1938. Unusually, there were transcriptions of all comments at these meetings, even of the smallest verbal utterance. The transcriptions offer a novel look at these researchers' theoretical and practical approaches to intelligence testing and its place in education. Aspects of Thomson's and Spearman's personalities are in evidence too, from this unique source. One particular conversation among the three leads to an important new insight about intelligence and intelligence testing. These conversations provide new and complementary information on a trio of leading intelligence researchers whose individual contributions and interactions with each other were seminal in the scientific study of human cognitive abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
ISSN:1093-4510
1939-0610
DOI:10.1037/1093-4510.11.3.163