FLEXIBLE CORRECTIONS OF JUROR JUDGMENTS Implications for Jury Instructions
The Flexible Correction Model (FCM, D. T. Wegener & R. E. Petty, 1997 ; D. T. Wegener, R. E. Petty, & M. Dunn, 1998 ) conceptualizes efforts at bias correction (i.e., attempts to remove influences that are perceived as illegitimate or unwanted) as guided by people's naive theories (perc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 2000-09, Vol.6 (3), p.629-654 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Flexible Correction Model (FCM,
D. T. Wegener & R. E. Petty, 1997
;
D. T. Wegener, R. E. Petty, & M. Dunn, 1998
) conceptualizes efforts at bias correction (i.e., attempts to remove influences that are perceived as illegitimate or unwanted) as guided by people's naive theories (perceptions) of the influences at work in that judgment setting. In this article, the authors present this model, discuss the general support for this model outside of courtroom judgment, and discuss a variety of implications of this model for courtroom judgment in general and for the impact of judges' instructions to juries in particular. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-8971 1939-1528 |
DOI: | 10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.629 |