FLEXIBLE CORRECTIONS OF JUROR JUDGMENTS Implications for Jury Instructions

The Flexible Correction Model (FCM, D. T. Wegener & R. E. Petty, 1997 ; D. T. Wegener, R. E. Petty, & M. Dunn, 1998 ) conceptualizes efforts at bias correction (i.e., attempts to remove influences that are perceived as illegitimate or unwanted) as guided by people's naive theories (perc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 2000-09, Vol.6 (3), p.629-654
Hauptverfasser: Wegener, Duane T, Kerr, Norbert L, Fleming, Monique A, Petty, Richard E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Flexible Correction Model (FCM, D. T. Wegener & R. E. Petty, 1997 ; D. T. Wegener, R. E. Petty, & M. Dunn, 1998 ) conceptualizes efforts at bias correction (i.e., attempts to remove influences that are perceived as illegitimate or unwanted) as guided by people's naive theories (perceptions) of the influences at work in that judgment setting. In this article, the authors present this model, discuss the general support for this model outside of courtroom judgment, and discuss a variety of implications of this model for courtroom judgment in general and for the impact of judges' instructions to juries in particular.
ISSN:1076-8971
1939-1528
DOI:10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.629