RULES WERE MADE TO BE BROKEN: Reflections on Psychoanalytic Education and Clinical Process
We become psychoanalysts in the 2 interrelated contexts of education and clinical work. In both of these realms we contend with what Harold Bloom (1973) termed the "anxiety of influence," a set of experiences that reflects our struggles with indebtedness and creative individuation. As we d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychoanalytic psychology 2005-03, Vol.22 (2), p.261-278 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We become psychoanalysts in the 2 interrelated contexts of education and clinical work. In both of these realms we contend with what
Harold Bloom (1973)
termed the "anxiety of influence," a set of experiences that reflects our struggles with indebtedness and creative individuation. As we develop theoretically and clinically, we must give ourselves over to influence while evolving a personal identity and a unique expressive voice. A schematic model of clinical process, one that reflects this grappling with the anxiety of influence in our relationships to our theories of technique and our patients, is presented. A case example focuses on the convergence of educational and clinical developmental processes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0736-9735 1939-1331 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0736-9735.22.2.261 |