INTELLIGENCE AND JOB PERFORMANCE: Economic and Social Implications
General mental ability (intelligence) is the dominant determinant of the large individual differences in work output on the job revealed by research, but highly visible individual differences in citizenship behavior on the job make the intelligence-performance relationship harder to observe in every...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 1996-09, Vol.2 (3-4), p.447-472 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | General mental ability
(intelligence) is the dominant determinant of the large individual differences in work
output on the job revealed by research, but highly visible individual differences in
citizenship behavior on the job make the intelligence-performance relationship harder to
observe in everyday life. Over time, the validity of job experience for predicting
performance declines, while that of ability remains constant or increases. Path analyses
indicate that the major reason ability predicts performance so well is that higher ability
individuals learn relevant job knowledge more quickly and learn more of it. The current
social policy that strongly discourages use of mental ability in hiring is
counterproductive and has produced severe performance decrements. This policy should be
changed to encourage the use of ability measures. However, it should also encourage the
use of personality measures that increase overall predictive validity while simultaneously
reducing differences in minority-majority hiring rates. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-8971 1939-1528 |
DOI: | 10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.447 |