Avoiding bias in the search for artifact: A reply to Carlopio, Adair, Lindsay, and Spinner
J. Carlopio et al criticized several aspects of the present authors' procedures and conclusions in a study of S roles and contended that the entire "subject role" approach is misguided. In this reply, the merits of the arguments and follow-up study of Carlopio et al are considered alo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1983-12, Vol.45 (6), p.1225-1228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | J. Carlopio et al criticized several aspects of the present authors' procedures and conclusions in a study of S roles and contended that the entire "subject role" approach is misguided. In this reply, the merits of the arguments and follow-up study of Carlopio et al are considered along with the "alternative" conception of S behavior they proposed. (8 ref) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1225 |