Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation
A definition of counting is adopted from R. Gelman and R. M. Gallistel (1978) and Piaget (1952) that allows for a comparison between animal and human counting behavior. The evidence, which ranges from early anecdotal reports to modern experimental analyses, suggests that a variety of infrahumans ran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 1982-11, Vol.92 (3), p.547-571 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A definition of counting is adopted from R. Gelman and R. M. Gallistel (1978) and Piaget (1952) that allows for a comparison between animal and human counting behavior. The evidence, which ranges from early anecdotal reports to modern experimental analyses, suggests that a variety of infrahumans ranging from birds to primates can learn to count, although successful demonstrations are most likely to occur under relatively extreme experimental conditions when alternative predictors of food or safety are unavailable. Counting behavior appears to be a relatively unnatural response in infrahumans, and its acquisition may reflect the boundaries of the animal's associative abilities. (84 ref) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.547 |