On differential validity and bias

On differential validity and bias

Responds to J. E. Hunter and F. L. Schmidt's criticism that the present authors underestimated Type I bias and overestimated Type II bias in their analysis of studies of ethnic differences in employment test validity . It is suggested that it is premature to dismiss the issue of differential va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 1978-02, Vol.63 (1), p.19-21
Hauptverfasser: Katzell, Raymond A, Dyer, Frank J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Applications
Bias
Cultural Test Bias
Employment
Employment Tests
Ethnic
Human
Predictions
Psychology
Races
Test Validity
Tests
Validation
Validity
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Responds to J. E. Hunter and F. L. Schmidt's criticism that the present authors underestimated Type I bias and overestimated Type II bias in their analysis of studies of ethnic differences in employment test validity . It is suggested that it is premature to dismiss the issue of differential validity.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.63.1.19