Problem-Solving Instruction and Problem-Solving Transfer: The Correspondence Issue

R. E. Mayer and M. C. Wittrock (1996) have raised the specificity-generality issue as it applies to the teachable aspects of problem-solving transfer. Simply put, do the instructional practices that foster more efficient acquisition-learning of problem-solving strategies automatically foster more ef...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of educational psychology 2001-09, Vol.93 (3), p.571-578
1. Verfasser: Phye, Gary D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:R. E. Mayer and M. C. Wittrock (1996) have raised the specificity-generality issue as it applies to the teachable aspects of problem-solving transfer. Simply put, do the instructional practices that foster more efficient acquisition-learning of problem-solving strategies automatically foster more efficient problem-solving transfer? On the basis of the present findings the answer is "no." Four instructional conditions differing in levels of specificity produced different levels of acquisition. However, when the same students engaged in a delayed problem-solving task, comparable levels of problem-solving transfer performance were observed. In this case, a general approach to problem-solving instruction produced significantly poorer acquisition-learning performance but equally good problem-solving transfer performance. Results are discussed within the context of investigating prior knowledge ( F. Dochy, M. Segers, & M. M. Buehl, 1999 ) and the identification of source memory ( A. Koriat, M. Goldsmith, & A. Pansky, 2000 ) as a viable tool in this effort.
ISSN:0022-0663
1939-2176
DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.571