Unbiased Estimation of Sampling Variance of Correlations

In a recent article, P. E. Spector and E. L. Levine (1987) asserted that the estimate of sampling error variance used in validity generalization studies is biased when the number of correlations is relatively small. In addition, Spector and Levine maintained that the bias is such that the sampling e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 1988-05, Vol.73 (2), p.312-315
Hauptverfasser: Callender, John C, Osburn, H. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a recent article, P. E. Spector and E. L. Levine (1987) asserted that the estimate of sampling error variance used in validity generalization studies is biased when the number of correlations is relatively small. In addition, Spector and Levine maintained that the bias is such that the sampling error variance estimate seriously overestimates the actual variance of observed correlations. A partial replication of Spector and Levine's study showed that the alleged bias was due to a distributional artifact and that the sampling error estimate is not seriously biased. We review evidence from several Monte Carlo studies indicating that the sampling error estimate is quite accurate.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.312