Factors influencing the success of applied research
Conducted an intensive follow-up of 10 projects rated by the National Institute of Mental Health as very high or relatively low in successfully reaching their objectives or suitable modifications thereof, in writing clear and complete reports suitable for replication, and in disseminating findings....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 1973-02, Vol.28 (2), p.140-146 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 146 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 140 |
| container_title | The American psychologist |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Glaser, Edward M Taylor, Samuel H |
| description | Conducted an intensive follow-up of 10 projects rated by the National Institute of Mental Health as very high or relatively low in successfully reaching their objectives or suitable modifications thereof, in writing clear and complete reports suitable for replication, and in disseminating findings. Key personnel associated with each project completed a comprehensive interview schedule concerning idea development, project design, funding, research, development and dissemination of findings, and utilization of findings. Profiles of the successful and less successful projects were then formulated. The successful projects showed high levels of communication and involvement with the individuals involved in research and practice. The principle investigator designed and devoted his full time to the project. Potential consumers were involved and informed of project development, processes, and findings. Higher levels of dissemination and utilization of findings resulted. The less successful projects, while calm during the early stages of idea development, design, and funding, developed difficulties during research associated with limited and ineffective communication among the researchers and between researchers and practitioners. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0034203 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614352900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614352900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a241t-337ad0e746072be5b9d6af71b235ff269ec922988adf030c951ed2c9c6c6b4123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAUxIMouK6CH6GoBy_Vlz9Nm6MsuyoseFHYW0jTF7dLt41Je9hvb2T16Okxjx8zzBByTeGBAi8ftwBcMOAnZEYVL3KlYHNKZpDeOUi5OScXMe6SLCpFZ4SvjB2HELO2d92EvW37z2zcYhYnazHGbHCZ8b5rsckCRjTBbi_JmTNdxKvfOycfq-X74iVfvz2_Lp7WuWGCjjnnpWkASyGhZDUWtWqkcSWtGS-cY1KhVYypqjKNAw5WFRQbZpWVVtaCMj4nN0dfH4avCeOod8MU-hSpJRW8YCqVmpPb_yDKKlUmVxCJuj9SNgwxBnTah3ZvwkFT0D-76b_dEnp3RI032seDNWFsbYdRm73XrNJMUwH8G_S-ae0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614352900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing the success of applied research</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Glaser, Edward M ; Taylor, Samuel H</creator><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Edward M ; Taylor, Samuel H</creatorcontrib><description>Conducted an intensive follow-up of 10 projects rated by the National Institute of Mental Health as very high or relatively low in successfully reaching their objectives or suitable modifications thereof, in writing clear and complete reports suitable for replication, and in disseminating findings. Key personnel associated with each project completed a comprehensive interview schedule concerning idea development, project design, funding, research, development and dissemination of findings, and utilization of findings. Profiles of the successful and less successful projects were then formulated. The successful projects showed high levels of communication and involvement with the individuals involved in research and practice. The principle investigator designed and devoted his full time to the project. Potential consumers were involved and informed of project development, processes, and findings. Higher levels of dissemination and utilization of findings resulted. The less successful projects, while calm during the early stages of idea development, design, and funding, developed difficulties during research associated with limited and ineffective communication among the researchers and between researchers and practitioners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0034203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington, Va: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Experimentation ; Human ; Mental Health ; Scientific Communication</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 1973-02, Vol.28 (2), p.140-146</ispartof><rights>1973 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1973, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a241t-337ad0e746072be5b9d6af71b235ff269ec922988adf030c951ed2c9c6c6b4123</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Edward M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Samuel H</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing the success of applied research</title><title>The American psychologist</title><description>Conducted an intensive follow-up of 10 projects rated by the National Institute of Mental Health as very high or relatively low in successfully reaching their objectives or suitable modifications thereof, in writing clear and complete reports suitable for replication, and in disseminating findings. Key personnel associated with each project completed a comprehensive interview schedule concerning idea development, project design, funding, research, development and dissemination of findings, and utilization of findings. Profiles of the successful and less successful projects were then formulated. The successful projects showed high levels of communication and involvement with the individuals involved in research and practice. The principle investigator designed and devoted his full time to the project. Potential consumers were involved and informed of project development, processes, and findings. Higher levels of dissemination and utilization of findings resulted. The less successful projects, while calm during the early stages of idea development, design, and funding, developed difficulties during research associated with limited and ineffective communication among the researchers and between researchers and practitioners.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Scientific Communication</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAUxIMouK6CH6GoBy_Vlz9Nm6MsuyoseFHYW0jTF7dLt41Je9hvb2T16Okxjx8zzBByTeGBAi8ftwBcMOAnZEYVL3KlYHNKZpDeOUi5OScXMe6SLCpFZ4SvjB2HELO2d92EvW37z2zcYhYnazHGbHCZ8b5rsckCRjTBbi_JmTNdxKvfOycfq-X74iVfvz2_Lp7WuWGCjjnnpWkASyGhZDUWtWqkcSWtGS-cY1KhVYypqjKNAw5WFRQbZpWVVtaCMj4nN0dfH4avCeOod8MU-hSpJRW8YCqVmpPb_yDKKlUmVxCJuj9SNgwxBnTah3ZvwkFT0D-76b_dEnp3RI032seDNWFsbYdRm73XrNJMUwH8G_S-ae0</recordid><startdate>19730201</startdate><enddate>19730201</enddate><creator>Glaser, Edward M</creator><creator>Taylor, Samuel H</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19730201</creationdate><title>Factors influencing the success of applied research</title><author>Glaser, Edward M ; Taylor, Samuel H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a241t-337ad0e746072be5b9d6af71b235ff269ec922988adf030c951ed2c9c6c6b4123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Scientific Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Edward M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Samuel H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glaser, Edward M</au><au>Taylor, Samuel H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing the success of applied research</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><date>1973-02-01</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>140-146</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>Conducted an intensive follow-up of 10 projects rated by the National Institute of Mental Health as very high or relatively low in successfully reaching their objectives or suitable modifications thereof, in writing clear and complete reports suitable for replication, and in disseminating findings. Key personnel associated with each project completed a comprehensive interview schedule concerning idea development, project design, funding, research, development and dissemination of findings, and utilization of findings. Profiles of the successful and less successful projects were then formulated. The successful projects showed high levels of communication and involvement with the individuals involved in research and practice. The principle investigator designed and devoted his full time to the project. Potential consumers were involved and informed of project development, processes, and findings. Higher levels of dissemination and utilization of findings resulted. The less successful projects, while calm during the early stages of idea development, design, and funding, developed difficulties during research associated with limited and ineffective communication among the researchers and between researchers and practitioners.</abstract><cop>Arlington, Va</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0034203</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-066X |
| ispartof | The American psychologist, 1973-02, Vol.28 (2), p.140-146 |
| issn | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614352900 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Evaluation Experimentation Human Mental Health Scientific Communication |
| title | Factors influencing the success of applied research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T09%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20the%20success%20of%20applied%20research&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Glaser,%20Edward%20M&rft.date=1973-02-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=140-146&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0034203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614352900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614352900&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |