Science or Metaphysics?

Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The American psychologist 1999-06, Vol.54 (6), p.442-443
Hauptverfasser:	Daniels, Denise, Wong, Kenman
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adaptation Behavior Ethics Evolution Experimentation Human Methodology Psychology Theory Theory of Evolution
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	443
container_issue	6
container_start_page	442
container_title	The American psychologist
container_volume	54
creator	Daniels, Denise Wong, Kenman
description	Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.
doi_str_mv	10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.442
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614339927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>42640721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a275t-4cc5640d94948209bd82a3b7b48d894dcf9df04b42b2166d1640ddb710fc1e2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqWfBU1Jvsmo9JsjmJFL-g4kGF3kI2yeKWtrsmu4f-e7NUREE9DQPPOwMvQicE5wQzeYkxZhkWYp5zyEUOQHfQiCjGM6XwfBeNvsA-OohxkVZeKDJCx8-29mvrJ02YPPrOtG-bWNt4dYj2KrOM_uhzjtHr7c3L9D6bPd09TK9nmaGSdxlYywVgp0BBQbEqXUENK2UJhSsUOFspV2EogZaUCOHIgF0pCa4s8YmO0en2bhua997HTi-aPqzTSy0IMKYUlf8hSihhXOIiobO_EOGkoAqwhKToVtnQxBh8pdtQr0zYaIL1UKUemtJDU5qDFjpVmUIX25BpjW7jxprQ1Xbpo-1D8OtOm1X7XZ__rn-yD2PlftE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614339927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science or Metaphysics?</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Daniels, Denise ; Wong, Kenman</creator><contributor>Fowler, Raymond D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Denise ; Wong, Kenman ; Fowler, Raymond D</creatorcontrib><description>Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.442</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMPSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington, Va: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Behavior ; Ethics ; Evolution ; Experimentation ; Human ; Methodology ; Psychology ; Theory ; Theory of Evolution</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 1999-06, Vol.54 (6), p.442-443</ispartof><rights>1999 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 1999</rights><rights>1999, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Fowler, Raymond D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kenman</creatorcontrib><title>Science or Metaphysics?</title><title>The American psychologist</title><description>Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Theory of Evolution</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqWfBU1Jvsmo9JsjmJFL-g4kGF3kI2yeKWtrsmu4f-e7NUREE9DQPPOwMvQicE5wQzeYkxZhkWYp5zyEUOQHfQiCjGM6XwfBeNvsA-OohxkVZeKDJCx8-29mvrJ02YPPrOtG-bWNt4dYj2KrOM_uhzjtHr7c3L9D6bPd09TK9nmaGSdxlYywVgp0BBQbEqXUENK2UJhSsUOFspV2EogZaUCOHIgF0pCa4s8YmO0en2bhua997HTi-aPqzTSy0IMKYUlf8hSihhXOIiobO_EOGkoAqwhKToVtnQxBh8pdtQr0zYaIL1UKUemtJDU5qDFjpVmUIX25BpjW7jxprQ1Xbpo-1D8OtOm1X7XZ__rn-yD2PlftE</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Daniels, Denise</creator><creator>Wong, Kenman</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Science or Metaphysics?</title><author>Daniels, Denise ; Wong, Kenman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a275t-4cc5640d94948209bd82a3b7b48d894dcf9df04b42b2166d1640ddb710fc1e2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Theory of Evolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kenman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daniels, Denise</au><au>Wong, Kenman</au><au>Fowler, Raymond D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science or Metaphysics?</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>442-443</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><coden>AMPSAB</coden><abstract>Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.</abstract><cop>Arlington, Va</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.442</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0003-066X
ispartof	The American psychologist, 1999-06, Vol.54 (6), p.442-443
issn	0003-066X 1935-990X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_614339927
source	EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects	Adaptation Behavior Ethics Evolution Experimentation Human Methodology Psychology Theory Theory of Evolution
title	Science or Metaphysics?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T04%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20or%20Metaphysics?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Daniels,%20Denise&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=442-443&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft.coden=AMPSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E42640721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614339927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true