Science or Metaphysics?

Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The American psychologist 1999-06, Vol.54 (6), p.442-443
Hauptverfasser:	Daniels, Denise, Wong, Kenman
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adaptation Behavior Ethics Evolution Experimentation Human Methodology Psychology Theory Theory of Evolution
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Daniels and Wong comment on a paper by Buss, Haselton, Shackelford, Bleske, and Wakefield. They write that the consequences of Bell et al's philosphical presuppositions are reductionistic and call into question much of what the American Psychological Association advocates in its code of ethics.
ISSN:	0003-066X 1935-990X
DOI:	10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.442