Do Training Models Really Influence Scholarly Productivity?

Argues that the case made by G. Frank (see record 1984-27011-001) against the Boulder Model for training in clinical psychology is not applicable to at least one other model, the clinical psychology program at the University of Denver (UOD), which offers a doctorate in psychology. The UOD program is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1985-08, Vol.16 (4), p.467-468
1. Verfasser: JONES, NELSON F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Argues that the case made by G. Frank (see record 1984-27011-001) against the Boulder Model for training in clinical psychology is not applicable to at least one other model, the clinical psychology program at the University of Denver (UOD), which offers a doctorate in psychology. The UOD program is discussed in terms of its requirements and the research productivity of its graduates, based on a survey of 144 graduates. It is concluded that the training model espoused by a particular program may have little to do with the productivity of its graduates. (6 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
ISSN:0735-7028
1939-1323
DOI:10.1037/0735-7028.16.4.467