Do Training Models Really Influence Scholarly Productivity?
Argues that the case made by G. Frank (see record 1984-27011-001) against the Boulder Model for training in clinical psychology is not applicable to at least one other model, the clinical psychology program at the University of Denver (UOD), which offers a doctorate in psychology. The UOD program is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1985-08, Vol.16 (4), p.467-468 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Argues that the case made by G. Frank (see record 1984-27011-001) against the Boulder Model for training in clinical psychology is not applicable to at least one other model, the clinical psychology program at the University of Denver (UOD), which offers a doctorate in psychology. The UOD program is discussed in terms of its requirements and the research productivity of its graduates, based on a survey of 144 graduates. It is concluded that the training model espoused by a particular program may have little to do with the productivity of its graduates. (6 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-7028 1939-1323 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0735-7028.16.4.467 |