NEW ERA OF SKEPTICISM REGARDING CHILDREN'S CREDIBILITY
There is increasing skepticism regarding children's credibility. Three sources of this skepticism are discussed. First, the popular media is increasingly skeptical of child witnesses. Whereas press coverage of child victims during the 1980s was largely positive, coverage during the 1990s indica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 1995-06, Vol.1 (2), p.387-398 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There is increasing skepticism regarding children's credibility. Three sources of this skepticism are discussed. First, the popular media is increasingly skeptical of child witnesses. Whereas press coverage of child victims during the 1980s was largely positive, coverage during the 1990s indicates increasing doubt about children's credibility. Second, some writers in the psychological literature portray children in an unnecessarily negative light, contributing to unwarranted skepticism. Third, the 1994 decision in
State v. Michaels
is likely to exaggerate doubts about children's memory and suggestibility. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-8971 1939-1528 |
DOI: | 10.1037/1076-8971.1.2.387 |