MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE?
The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1987, Vol.24 (1), p.15-19 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 19 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 15 |
| container_title | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Zook, Avery Sipps, Gary J |
| description | The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance
Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate
students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their
experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling
psychology students report less manipulative tendencies than do experimental
students. There are no differences between the two groups in dominance,
suggesting that Machiavellianism and dominance are two separate dimensions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0085685 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614306490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614306490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-762444c96ff6eb61178265eb055e9eba5a3484d1424e8bdf9a1c20ed171691293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz09Lw0AQBfBFFKxV8BNI0YsI0Znd2U32GNKqgTQ9-Oe6bNINttQ27qaHfntTqgfB04PHjxkeY5cI9wgifvgASKRK5BEboBY6QinUMRsACBEJDnTKzkJYAqAGogG7mqbZc56-T4oiT8v8ZTpKy_FoPJvmZVpmk3N20thVcBc_OWRvj5PX7DkqZk95lhaRFSi7KFaciGqtmka5SiHGCVfSVSCl066y0gpKaI7EySXVvNEWaw5ujjEqjVyLIbs-3G395mvrQmeWm61f9y-NQhKgSEOPbg-o9psQvGtM6xef1u8MgtmPN7_je3p3oLa1pg272vpuUa9cqLfeu3XXd53hZNDgHt_8j_-ob_8GYac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614306490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE?</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Zook, Avery ; Sipps, Gary J</creator><contributor>Freedheim, Donald K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zook, Avery ; Sipps, Gary J ; Freedheim, Donald K</creatorcontrib><description>The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance
Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate
students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their
experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling
psychology students report less manipulative tendencies than do experimental
students. There are no differences between the two groups in dominance,
suggesting that Machiavellianism and dominance are two separate dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0085685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Division of Psychotherapy , American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Counselor Characteristics ; Counselor Trainees ; Experimental Psychology ; Graduate Psychology Education ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Machiavellianism</subject><ispartof>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 1987, Vol.24 (1), p.15-19</ispartof><rights>1987 Division of Psychotherapy (29), American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1987 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1987, Division of Psychotherapy (29), American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-762444c96ff6eb61178265eb055e9eba5a3484d1424e8bdf9a1c20ed171691293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Freedheim, Donald K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zook, Avery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipps, Gary J</creatorcontrib><title>MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE?</title><title>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)</title><description>The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance
Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate
students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their
experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling
psychology students report less manipulative tendencies than do experimental
students. There are no differences between the two groups in dominance,
suggesting that Machiavellianism and dominance are two separate dimensions.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Counselor Characteristics</subject><subject>Counselor Trainees</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Graduate Psychology Education</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Machiavellianism</subject><issn>0033-3204</issn><issn>1939-1536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptz09Lw0AQBfBFFKxV8BNI0YsI0Znd2U32GNKqgTQ9-Oe6bNINttQ27qaHfntTqgfB04PHjxkeY5cI9wgifvgASKRK5BEboBY6QinUMRsACBEJDnTKzkJYAqAGogG7mqbZc56-T4oiT8v8ZTpKy_FoPJvmZVpmk3N20thVcBc_OWRvj5PX7DkqZk95lhaRFSi7KFaciGqtmka5SiHGCVfSVSCl066y0gpKaI7EySXVvNEWaw5ujjEqjVyLIbs-3G395mvrQmeWm61f9y-NQhKgSEOPbg-o9psQvGtM6xef1u8MgtmPN7_je3p3oLa1pg272vpuUa9cqLfeu3XXd53hZNDgHt_8j_-ob_8GYac</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Zook, Avery</creator><creator>Sipps, Gary J</creator><general>Division of Psychotherapy , American Psychological Association</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE</title><author>Zook, Avery ; Sipps, Gary J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-762444c96ff6eb61178265eb055e9eba5a3484d1424e8bdf9a1c20ed171691293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Counselor Characteristics</topic><topic>Counselor Trainees</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Graduate Psychology Education</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Machiavellianism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zook, Avery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipps, Gary J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zook, Avery</au><au>Sipps, Gary J</au><au>Freedheim, Donald K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE?</atitle><jtitle>Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>15-19</pages><issn>0033-3204</issn><eissn>1939-1536</eissn><abstract>The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance
Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate
students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their
experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling
psychology students report less manipulative tendencies than do experimental
students. There are no differences between the two groups in dominance,
suggesting that Machiavellianism and dominance are two separate dimensions.</abstract><pub>Division of Psychotherapy , American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0085685</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3204 |
| ispartof | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 1987, Vol.24 (1), p.15-19 |
| issn | 0033-3204 1939-1536 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614306490 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Authoritarianism Counselor Characteristics Counselor Trainees Experimental Psychology Graduate Psychology Education Human Human Sex Differences Machiavellianism |
| title | MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A18%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MACHIAVELLIANISM%20AND%20DOMINANCE:%20ARE%20THERAPISTS%20IN%20TRAINING%20MANIPULATIVE?&rft.jtitle=Psychotherapy%20(Chicago,%20Ill.)&rft.au=Zook,%20Avery&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=15-19&rft.issn=0033-3204&rft.eissn=1939-1536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0085685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614306490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614306490&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |