MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE?

The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1987, Vol.24 (1), p.15-19
Hauptverfasser: Zook, Avery, Sipps, Gary J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling psychology students report less manipulative tendencies than do experimental students. There are no differences between the two groups in dominance, suggesting that Machiavellianism and dominance are two separate dimensions.
ISSN:0033-3204
1939-1536
DOI:10.1037/h0085685