MACHIAVELLIANISM AND DOMINANCE: ARE THERAPISTS IN TRAINING MANIPULATIVE?
The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1987, Vol.24 (1), p.15-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The present study uses the Mach IV, Factor N of the 16 PF, and the Dominance
Scale of the PRF in an attempt to determine if counseling psychology graduate
students are more interpersonally manipulative and dominant than their
experimental psychology counterparts. The study concludes that counseling
psychology students report less manipulative tendencies than do experimental
students. There are no differences between the two groups in dominance,
suggesting that Machiavellianism and dominance are two separate dimensions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-3204 1939-1536 |
DOI: | 10.1037/h0085685 |