Journal ranking by citation analysis: Some inconsistencies
Compares 2 strategies employed in evaluating the relative standing and importance of psychology journals. The following studies used the ranking strategy: D. Koulack and H. J. Keselman and K. C. Mace and H. D. Warner (1973). These studies advocate the citation statistics strategy: M. Boor (1973), A....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 1978-08, Vol.33 (8), p.778-780 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Compares 2 strategies employed in evaluating the relative standing and importance of psychology journals. The following studies used the ranking strategy: D. Koulack and H. J. Keselman and K. C. Mace and H. D. Warner (1973). These studies advocate the citation statistics strategy: M. Boor (1973), A. R. Buss and J. R. McDermott (1976), M. J. White and K. G. White (1977), E. Garfield (1975), and A. D. Porter (1976). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
| DOI: | 10.1037/0003-066X.33.8.778 |