Another view of progress in validity generalization: Reply to Schmidt, Hunter, and Pearlman

Another view of progress in validity generalization: Reply to Schmidt, Hunter, and Pearlman

Refutes the F. L. Schmidt et al argument that the present authors' work on validity generalization models contained erroneous conclusions. Modifications to past practices in computing and reporting variance estimates are recommended. (3 ref)

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 1982-12, Vol.67 (6), p.846-852
Hauptverfasser: Callender, John C, Osburn, H. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Estimation
Human
Simulation
Statistical Validity
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Refutes the F. L. Schmidt et al argument that the present authors' work on validity generalization models contained erroneous conclusions. Modifications to past practices in computing and reporting variance estimates are recommended. (3 ref)
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.846