A note on Zimmer and Pepyne's study comparing counselor response

Presents methodological criticisms of J. Zimmer and E. Pepyne's (see pa, vol. 47:issue 2) study of counselor responses to clients. The use of a commercial film representing 3 eminent psychotherapists treating the same patient in separate sessions forms the major portion of the criticism in that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of counseling psychology 1971-09, Vol.18 (5), p.448-449
1. Verfasser: Fiedler, Fred E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Presents methodological criticisms of J. Zimmer and E. Pepyne's (see pa, vol. 47:issue 2) study of counselor responses to clients. The use of a commercial film representing 3 eminent psychotherapists treating the same patient in separate sessions forms the major portion of the criticism in that (a) the therapists were representing their various theoretical approaches, (b) nothing was known of the patient, and (c) the sample was limited to 3 therapists. It is concluded that the findings of zimmer and pepyne that therapists differ significantly in their responses to patients cannot be supported by their methodology.
ISSN:0022-0167
1939-2168
DOI:10.1037/h0031493