Generation(s) of phonological codes in reading: A reply to Guttentag

Addresses R. E. Guttentag's 2 questions about the review by L. X. McCusker et al of the phonological recoding literature. Following Guttentag's suggestion, the possibility of phonological mediation without the use of grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules is considered. It is recognized as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 1982-03, Vol.91 (2), p.369-371
Hauptverfasser: Bias, Randolph G, McCusker, Leo X, Hillinger, Michael L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Addresses R. E. Guttentag's 2 questions about the review by L. X. McCusker et al of the phonological recoding literature. Following Guttentag's suggestion, the possibility of phonological mediation without the use of grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules is considered. It is recognized as a logically possible supplement to phonological recoding, but no empirical support was found. Guttentag's discussion of how dependence on phonological recoding might change with increased age and reading skill is also addressed. (12 ref)
ISSN:0033-2909
1939-1455
DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.369