What Are We Testing?

A measure that samples both the sophistication of infants' behaviors and infants' propensity to demonstrate their most sophisticated repertoire of skills was developed and tested for predictability of infant functioning across a 6-month time span. This measure of spontaneous mastery, unlik...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental psychology 1985-03, Vol.21 (2), p.226-232
Hauptverfasser: Hrncir, Elizabeth J, Speller, Gerda M, West, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A measure that samples both the sophistication of infants' behaviors and infants' propensity to demonstrate their most sophisticated repertoire of skills was developed and tested for predictability of infant functioning across a 6-month time span. This measure of spontaneous mastery, unlike a measure of executive capacity with which it is compared, was highly stable across the 6 months. Twelve-month spontaneous mastery scores predicted 18-month-old performance on the Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) as well as the Bayley itself. Common to both the spontaneous mastery measure and the Bayley MDI is the construct of mastery leading toward developmental competence, suggesting that the more proficient children are at mastering tasks on their own the more inclined they might be to maximize their potentials in testing and learning environments. The greater predictability of the spontaneous mastery measure suggests a means for elucidating individual differences in the motivation/competence relationship that remain stable across developmental epochs.
ISSN:0012-1649
1939-0599
DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.226