Making Decisions in Ambiguous Situations

Review of the book, "Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making" (2004; see record 2005-03974-000) by Kip Smith, James Shanteau, and Paul Johnson (Eds.). Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making is an eclectic collection of chapters that delve into a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PsycCritiques 2005-01, Vol.50 (2), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified
Hauptverfasser: Chmielewski, Todd L., Moreland, Jeremy L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page No Pagination Specified
container_issue 2
container_start_page No Pagination Specified
container_title PsycCritiques
container_volume 50
creator Chmielewski, Todd L.
Moreland, Jeremy L.
description Review of the book, "Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making" (2004; see record 2005-03974-000) by Kip Smith, James Shanteau, and Paul Johnson (Eds.). Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making is an eclectic collection of chapters that delve into an individual's capacity to make decisions in ambiguous situations. Each of the book's eight chapters addresses decision making in a particular context or a theoretical issue relevant to decision making. This book investigates the role of metacognition in decision making, and overall it is a worthwhile read. The chapters are well written, and the research presented by the authors is varied in both methodology and rigor. Although the collection of research would have benefited greatly from synthesis and reaction from the editors, the chapters are useful for researchers of decision making and metacognition but less so for practitioners. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/040790
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614232025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614232025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585-c739069f58ec5c8c835c1dda326575bfdf8dd6f0edc993a924d24c2d5e5ae2c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXAM0QcEJfQtZ1N7GNVClQq4kDvluufyoXGxU4OvD2pwoHTjEbf7EpDyC2FRwq8mUEFjYQzMqGIVQmUi_N__pJc5byHAeRCTsjDm_4M7a54cibkENtchLaYH7Zh18c-Fx-h63V3yq_Jhddf2d386ZRsnpebxWu5fn9ZLebr0qDA0jRcQi09CmfQCCM4Gmqt5qzGBrfeemFt7cFZIyXXklWWVYZZdKgdG9pTcjeePab43bvcqX3sUzt8VDWtGGfAcIDuR8ikmHNyXh1TOOj0oyio0wZq3ID_At-VTG8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614232025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making Decisions in Ambiguous Situations</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chmielewski, Todd L. ; Moreland, Jeremy L.</creator><contributor>Wedding, Danny</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chmielewski, Todd L. ; Moreland, Jeremy L. ; Wedding, Danny</creatorcontrib><description>Review of the book, "Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making" (2004; see record 2005-03974-000) by Kip Smith, James Shanteau, and Paul Johnson (Eds.). Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making is an eclectic collection of chapters that delve into an individual's capacity to make decisions in ambiguous situations. Each of the book's eight chapters addresses decision making in a particular context or a theoretical issue relevant to decision making. This book investigates the role of metacognition in decision making, and overall it is a worthwhile read. The chapters are well written, and the research presented by the authors is varied in both methodology and rigor. Although the collection of research would have benefited greatly from synthesis and reaction from the editors, the chapters are useful for researchers of decision making and metacognition but less so for practitioners. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-0138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-0138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/040790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Competence ; Decision Making ; Human ; Metacognition</subject><ispartof>PsycCritiques, 2005-01, Vol.50 (2), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wedding, Danny</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chmielewski, Todd L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreland, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Making Decisions in Ambiguous Situations</title><title>PsycCritiques</title><description>Review of the book, "Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making" (2004; see record 2005-03974-000) by Kip Smith, James Shanteau, and Paul Johnson (Eds.). Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making is an eclectic collection of chapters that delve into an individual's capacity to make decisions in ambiguous situations. Each of the book's eight chapters addresses decision making in a particular context or a theoretical issue relevant to decision making. This book investigates the role of metacognition in decision making, and overall it is a worthwhile read. The chapters are well written, and the research presented by the authors is varied in both methodology and rigor. Although the collection of research would have benefited greatly from synthesis and reaction from the editors, the chapters are useful for researchers of decision making and metacognition but less so for practitioners. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><issn>1554-0138</issn><issn>1554-0138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXAM0QcEJfQtZ1N7GNVClQq4kDvluufyoXGxU4OvD2pwoHTjEbf7EpDyC2FRwq8mUEFjYQzMqGIVQmUi_N__pJc5byHAeRCTsjDm_4M7a54cibkENtchLaYH7Zh18c-Fx-h63V3yq_Jhddf2d386ZRsnpebxWu5fn9ZLebr0qDA0jRcQi09CmfQCCM4Gmqt5qzGBrfeemFt7cFZIyXXklWWVYZZdKgdG9pTcjeePab43bvcqX3sUzt8VDWtGGfAcIDuR8ikmHNyXh1TOOj0oyio0wZq3ID_At-VTG8</recordid><startdate>20050112</startdate><enddate>20050112</enddate><creator>Chmielewski, Todd L.</creator><creator>Moreland, Jeremy L.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050112</creationdate><title>Making Decisions in Ambiguous Situations</title><author>Chmielewski, Todd L. ; Moreland, Jeremy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585-c739069f58ec5c8c835c1dda326575bfdf8dd6f0edc993a924d24c2d5e5ae2c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chmielewski, Todd L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreland, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>PsycCritiques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chmielewski, Todd L.</au><au>Moreland, Jeremy L.</au><au>Wedding, Danny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making Decisions in Ambiguous Situations</atitle><jtitle>PsycCritiques</jtitle><date>2005-01-12</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>No Pagination Specified</spage><epage>No Pagination Specified</epage><pages>No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified</pages><issn>1554-0138</issn><eissn>1554-0138</eissn><abstract>Review of the book, "Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making" (2004; see record 2005-03974-000) by Kip Smith, James Shanteau, and Paul Johnson (Eds.). Psychological Investigations of Competence in Decision Making is an eclectic collection of chapters that delve into an individual's capacity to make decisions in ambiguous situations. Each of the book's eight chapters addresses decision making in a particular context or a theoretical issue relevant to decision making. This book investigates the role of metacognition in decision making, and overall it is a worthwhile read. The chapters are well written, and the research presented by the authors is varied in both methodology and rigor. Although the collection of research would have benefited greatly from synthesis and reaction from the editors, the chapters are useful for researchers of decision making and metacognition but less so for practitioners. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/040790</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1554-0138
ispartof PsycCritiques, 2005-01, Vol.50 (2), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified
issn 1554-0138
1554-0138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614232025
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Competence
Decision Making
Human
Metacognition
title Making Decisions in Ambiguous Situations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20Decisions%20in%20Ambiguous%20Situations&rft.jtitle=PsycCritiques&rft.au=Chmielewski,%20Todd%20L.&rft.date=2005-01-12&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.epage=No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.pages=No%20Pagination%20Specified-No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.issn=1554-0138&rft.eissn=1554-0138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/040790&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614232025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614232025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true