The Leaching Potential and Recovery of 15-N-Fertilizer by Sugarcane Cultivated in Sandy Soil

Leaching is an important loss pathway that limits N-fertilizer recovery by sugarcane. Our study evaluated the potential for leaching and recovery of 15 N-fertilizer by sugarcane cultivated in sandy soil. Three nitrogen fertilization management strategies were tested: single dose (80 kg ha −1 ), spli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sugar tech : an international journal of sugar crops & related industries 2025-02, Vol.27 (1), p.119-133
Hauptverfasser: de Sousa Silva, Ariane Márcia, de Oliveira, Emídio Cantídio Almeida, de Andrade, Joel José, Lima, Amanda Michele Santos, de Almeida, Brivaldo Gomes, Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze, Freire, Fernando José, Guimarães, Dante Hugo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Leaching is an important loss pathway that limits N-fertilizer recovery by sugarcane. Our study evaluated the potential for leaching and recovery of 15 N-fertilizer by sugarcane cultivated in sandy soil. Three nitrogen fertilization management strategies were tested: single dose (80 kg ha −1 ), split (40 kg ha −1  + 40 kg ha −1 ) and supplementation (80 kg ha −1  + 40 kg ha −1 ), one more control; without nitrogen (N). Ammonium nitrate (AN) and ammonium sulphate (AS) were the sources N used. Leaching was determined by the N-mineral concentration (NH 4 + , NO 2 − and NO 3 − ) and 15 N-fertilizer in the soil solution at a depth of 0.7 m. Nitrogen recovery was quantified using 15 N-fertilizer in the sugarcane shoots. Significant leaching occurred in the first 60 days after fertilization (DAF), but splitting the fertilization reduced N-mineral leaching by 50%. During this period, 78% of the nitrogen in the leachate originated from the fertilizer (NDFF (L) ). The contribution of nitrogen fertilization was highest in the first 30 DAF, where the fertilizer accounted for 39% of the nitrogen absorbed by sugarcane. But the plant’s nitrogen recovery (R) was limited to only 4% of the applied nitrogen. At harvest, the R of 15 N-fertilizer by sugarcane was less than 20%. Splitting or applying a single dose of fertilizer did not improve nitrogen recovery at the end of the cycle. Our study showed that the leaching and recovery of 15 N-fertilizer were found to be proportional to the applied doses according to the management strategies and nitrogen sources compensated for nitrogen leaching throughout the cycle.
ISSN:0972-1525
0974-0740
DOI:10.1007/s12355-024-01479-w