Perioperative Complications in Patients of Acute Cholecystitis, Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy versus Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Comparative Study

Objective: To compare the frequency of perioperative complications in patients with acute cholecystitis who undergo “early laparoscopic cholecystectomy” versus those who have “interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Milita...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2024-12, Vol.74 (6), p.1584-1587
Hauptverfasser: Hassan, Najmul, Khan, Shahid Mehmood, Bajwa, Khurram, Hussain, Syed Mukarram, Batool, Wajeeha, Ashraf, Imran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To compare the frequency of perioperative complications in patients with acute cholecystitis who undergo “early laparoscopic cholecystectomy” versus those who have “interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Aug 2022 to May 2023. Methodology: This study included all the patients who had acute cholecystitis and were admitted to the surgery ward for its management. Half of the patients were selected who underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, while the remaining half had interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The frequency of perioperative complications was noted in both groups. Results: In our study, we included 50 patients (25 in group-A, who had “early laparoscopic cholecystectomy” while 25 in group-B, who had “interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy”). The mean age of the study population was 43.70±5.91 years. 18(36.00%) were male while the remaining 32(64.00%) were female. In our study, frequency of perioperative complications in group-A was injury to common bile duct 2(8.00%), biliary leak 3(12.00%), haemorrhage 4(16.00%) and conversion to open cholecystectomy 1(4.00%) while in group-B these were 0(0.00%), 1(4.00%), 2(8.00%) and 0(0.00%), respectively [with corresponding p-values of 0.149, 0.297, 0.384 and 0.312, respectively. Conclusion: Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a better surgical treatment option for patients with “acute cholecystitis”.
ISSN:0030-9648
2411-8842
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v74i6.10064