Use of the Modified Functional Status Questionnaire to Assess Functioning in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis Treated with Pimavanserin

IntroductionPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly collected in clinical trials and real-world studies as they provide valuable information on the impact of a treatment from the patient’s perspective. Studies in Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) have focused on hallucination and delusio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CNS spectrums 2024-10, Vol.29 (5), p.495-496
Hauptverfasser: Evidente, Virgilio G. H., Chrones, Lambros, Revankar, Ratna, Doshi, Dilesh, Abler, Victor, Rashid, Nazia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IntroductionPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly collected in clinical trials and real-world studies as they provide valuable information on the impact of a treatment from the patient’s perspective. Studies in Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) have focused on hallucination and delusions, however individuals with PDP also face functional limitations associated with worsening psychosis. Assessing activities of daily living (ADLs) and functioning of PDP patients can help inform PDP treatment. The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society has recommended the use of the Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) which has been infrequently utilized. Prior results were reported from a Phase 4 open-label study examining the impact of pimavanserin on ADLs and functioning in patients with PDP which utilized a modified version of the FSQ (mFSQ) as the primary outcome measure. In this analysis, we provide additional data on the patient-reported mFSQ within specific domains and correlation to the Schwab & England ADL scale.MethodsEligible patients entered a 16-week single-arm, open-label study of once-daily oral pimvanserin (34mg). The 6 domain FSQ was modified to assess 5 domains by removing the work/performance domain since this was not applicable to the patients in this study. The mean change from baseline to week 16 was evaluated in mFSQ domains (Basic ADL, Intermediate ADL, Psychological Function, Quality of Interaction, Social Activity). In addition, correlation between Schwab & England ADL scale and observed mFSQ value across post-Baseline visits were evaluated.ResultsA total of 29 patients were enrolled in the study, mean age (70.2 years), 62% males. The MMRM LSM (SE) for mSFQ from baseline to Week 16 were the following within each domain: Basic ADL (n=22), 8.1 (2.41), p=0.0031; Intermediate ADL (n=21), 7.0 (3.00), p=0.0286; Psychological Function (n=22), 13.3 (1.94), p
ISSN:1092-8529
2165-6509
DOI:10.1017/S109285292400155X