PD214 Appraisal Of Reimbursement Thresholds For Medicines In Brazil’s Private Health System

IntroductionBrazil’s public health system serves most of the population, but 25 percent of citizens rely on private health insurance. The National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans (ANS) regulates private medicine reimbursements, which diverge from the public sector threshold....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2025-01, Vol.40 (S1), p.S175-S175
Hauptverfasser: Borin, Marcus Carvalho, Martins, Carina Rejane, dos Reis, Daniel Pitchon, Coelho Ribeiro, Geraldo Jose, Tupinambas, Julia Teixeira, de Castro Zocrato, Karina, de Almeida Carvalho, Lelia Maria, de Freitas, Marcela Pinto, da Gloria Cruvinel Horta, Maria, Barbosa, Mariana Michel, Torres Talim, Mariza Cristina, Loureiro Bersan, Sergio Adriano, Bruschi Kelles, Silvana Marcia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IntroductionBrazil’s public health system serves most of the population, but 25 percent of citizens rely on private health insurance. The National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans (ANS) regulates private medicine reimbursements, which diverge from the public sector threshold. In 2022, the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) set a willingness-to-pay benchmark of BRL40,000 (USD8,215) per quality-adjusted life-year. The ANS has no such benchmark, highlighting a pivotal gap in economic evaluations for private health care.MethodsThis quantitative study investigated the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for reimbursed medicines in Brazil’s private health sector, comparing them with CONITEC’s benchmarks and international thresholds. Data were extracted from industry reimbursement submissions to the ANS and analyzed for statistical disparity and policy implications.ResultsPreliminary findings found an ICER peak of BRL619,900 (USD127,220) per quality-adjusted life-year for talazoparib, which is used to treat certain advanced breast cancers. This contrasted sharply with CONITEC’s established threshold, indicating a critical need to evaluate ANS policies.ConclusionsEarly results indicate that the ICERs for some medicines surpass CONITEC’s willingness-to-pay limit, suggesting that the ANS should consider establishing a defined cost-effectiveness threshold. This is imperative to harmonize with global standards and maintain sustainable health financing.
ISSN:0266-4623
1471-6348
DOI:10.1017/S0266462324004355