Women with IBD Show Higher Psychophysiological Burden in Comparison to Men with IBD

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains an incurable illness. Patients with IBD show gender-specific differences in various aspects of the disease. There is still uncertainty about the causality of the differences. Methods: The aim of this study was to determine the most relevant psycho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-01, Vol.13 (24), p.7806
Hauptverfasser: Schulz, Franziska, Foldenauer, Ann Christina, Weidmann, Lara, Thomann, Anne Kerstin, Andrea Oliver Tal, Plachta-Danielzik, Sandra, Krause, Thomas, Bokemeyer, Bernd, Zeuzem, Stefan, Kubesch, Alica, Blumenstein, Irina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains an incurable illness. Patients with IBD show gender-specific differences in various aspects of the disease. There is still uncertainty about the causality of the differences. Methods: The aim of this study was to determine the most relevant psychophysiological gender-specific differences in IBD. For this purpose, a questionnaire survey was conducted on disease activity and psychological concomitant diseases in patients with IBD (n = 300). Among the 218 patients with IBD who provided gender information, both genders were equally distributed. Results: Females with IBD are significantly more affected by IBD-related symptoms than men. Disease activity Scores Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), Partial Mayo Score (pMAYO) showed no significant differences between the sexes in the subgroups with CD (HBI, m: 3 (IQR 1–6), w: 4 (IQR 2–8), p = 0.0677) and UC (pMAYO, m: 1 (IQR 0–4), w: 3 (IQR 0–5), p = 0.2118). IBD Questionnaire (IBDQ)shows significant differences in the gender-specific analysis. The mean value of the IBDQ total score of the female participants was 4.4 (SD 1.1) and that of men was 5.0 (SD 1.0) (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: There is a great need to investigate the causality of gender-specific differences in greater depth.
ISSN:2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13247806