Jitter Across 15 Years: Leveraging Precise Photometry from Kepler and TESS to Extract Exoplanets from Radial Velocity Time Series

Stellar activity contamination of radial velocity (RV) data is one of the top challenges plaguing the field of extreme precision RV (EPRV) science. Previous work has shown that photometry can be very effective at removing such signals from RV data, especially stellar activity caused by rotating star...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Beard, Corey, Robertson, Paul, Lubin, Jack, Han, Te, Holcomb, Rae, Premnath, Pranav, Butler, R Paul, Dalba, Paul A, Holden, Brad, Blake, Cullen H, Diddams, Scott A, Gupta, Arvind F, Halverson, Samuel, Krolikowski, Daniel M, Li, Dan, Lin, Andrea S J, Logsdon, Sarah E, Lubar, Emily, Mahadevan, Suvrath, McElwain, Michael W, Ninan, Joe P, Paredes, Leonardo A, Roy, Arpita, Schwab, Christian, Stefansson, Gudmundur, Terrien, Ryan C, Wright, Jason T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Stellar activity contamination of radial velocity (RV) data is one of the top challenges plaguing the field of extreme precision RV (EPRV) science. Previous work has shown that photometry can be very effective at removing such signals from RV data, especially stellar activity caused by rotating star spots and plage.The exact utility of photometry for removing RV activity contamination, and the best way to apply it, is not well known. We present a combination photometric and RV study of eight Kepler/K2 FGK stars with known stellar variability. We use NEID RVs acquired simultaneously with TESS photometry, and we perform injection recovery tests to quantify the efficacy of recent TESS photometry versus archival Kepler/K2 photometry for removing stellar variability from RVs. We additionally experiment with different TESS sectors when training our models in order to quantify the real benefit of simultaneously acquired RVs and photometry. We conclude that Kepler photometry typically performs better than TESS at removing noise from RV data when it is available, likely due to longer baseline and precision. In contrast, for targets with available K2 photometry, especially those most active, and with high precision (\(\sigma_{NEID}\) \(
ISSN:2331-8422