Advancing democratic processes in Ecuador: A case study on neural network‐driven OCR for election report verification
Background In Ecuador, scepticism surrounding electoral outcomes underscores the need for a reliable system to ensure transparent election results. Manual verification demands a more efficient approach due to the vast volume of election reports. This research introduces an automated system leveragin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Expert systems 2025-01, Vol.42 (1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
In Ecuador, scepticism surrounding electoral outcomes underscores the need for a reliable system to ensure transparent election results. Manual verification demands a more efficient approach due to the vast volume of election reports. This research introduces an automated system leveraging Artificial Intelligence to process results from Ecuador's three recent national elections.
Methods
The system, designed with a three‐layer architecture, extracts, processes, analyses, classifies and compares election results. We thoroughly analysed the National Electoral Council of Ecuador (CNE) web pages for effective data extraction and processing. Rigorous unit and acceptance tests validated the system's functionality. A classifier model, trained using data augmentation techniques, achieved a 98% accuracy rate.
Results
While the system boasts high efficiency, we identified three errors, accounting for less than 5% of the total fields processed. Notably, the quality of scanned reports and illegible handwritten numbers posed challenges for the classifier.
Conclusions
The system's deployment by an authorized entity in Ecuador could enhance the CNE's information verification. Despite some errors, the system's potential is clear. Future work includes refining classifiers, verifying officer signatures, and expanding the system's scope, aiming for a more transparent electoral process. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-4720 1468-0394 |
DOI: | 10.1111/exsy.13578 |