Incorporating spatial variability in surface runoff modeling with new DEM-based distributed approaches

This study introduces two novel DEM-based distributed rainfall-runoff models derived from the existing Hidropixel model: Hidropixel TUH+ and Hidropixel DLR . These models account for spatial variations in direct runoff generation, translation, and storage within a watershed, considering spatial vari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational geosciences 2024-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1331-1348
Hauptverfasser: Lima, Dário Macedo, da Paz, Adriano Rolim, Xuan, Yunqing, Piccilli, Daniel Gustavo Allasia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study introduces two novel DEM-based distributed rainfall-runoff models derived from the existing Hidropixel model: Hidropixel TUH+ and Hidropixel DLR . These models account for spatial variations in direct runoff generation, translation, and storage within a watershed, considering spatial variability in rainfall and basin characteristics. In Hidropixel TUH+ , a Triangular Unit Hydrograph (TUH) is determined for each Digital Elevation Model (DEM) pixel and lagged to the watershed outlet based on the travel time from the pixel to the outlet. In Hidropixel DLR , a hydrograph is estimated for each pixel based on the travel time, which takes translation effects into account. To represent the storage effects, this hydrograph is attenuated by a linear reservoir at each pixel. Both approaches were applied to the Upper Medway catchment (250 km 2 ) in southeastern England, using rainfall data from a rain gauge network. The outcomes revealed that the proposed approaches provided a reasonably accurate prediction of the hydrographs and exhibited notably superior performance compared to the original version of Hidropixel, which has limited capabilities in capturing translation effects. Hidropixel TUH+ and Hidropixel DLR predicted peak flows with an average absolute error of 11% and 10%, respectively. The Hidropixel DLR achieved a more accurate time-to-peak estimation, with an average absolute error of 1 h, compared to the 1.5-h error from Hidropixel TUH+ . Additionally, the Hidropixel DLR predicted the full direct runoff hydrograph more accurately, achieving an average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient ( NSE ) of 0.89, while the Hidropixel TUH+ had an NSE of approximately 0.84.
ISSN:1420-0597
1573-1499
DOI:10.1007/s10596-024-10321-x