Food and land system transformations under different societal perspectives on sustainable development

The future of food and land systems is crucial for achieving multiple UN Sustainable Development Goals, given their essential role in providing adequate nutrition and their significant impact on Earth system processes. Despite widespread consensus on the need for transformation, discussed strategies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research letters 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.124085
Hauptverfasser: Weindl, Isabelle, Soergel, Bjoern, Ambrósio, Geanderson, Daioglou, Vassilis, Doelman, Jonathan, Beier, Felicitas, Beusen, Arthur, Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, Bos, Astrid, Dietrich, Jan Philipp, Humpenöder, Florian, von Jeetze, Patrick, Karstens, Kristine, Rauner, Sebastian, Stehfest, Elke, Stevanović, Miodrag, van Zeist, Willem-Jan, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, van Vuuren, Detlef, Kriegler, Elmar, Popp, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The future of food and land systems is crucial for achieving multiple UN Sustainable Development Goals, given their essential role in providing adequate nutrition and their significant impact on Earth system processes. Despite widespread consensus on the need for transformation, discussed strategies vary widely, from technology-driven to sufficiency-focused approaches, emphasizing different agents of change and policy mixes. This study assesses the implications of a new generation of target-seeking scenarios incorporating such diverse sustainability perspectives. We apply two integrated assessment models to explore food and land futures under three whole-economy sustainable development pathways (SDPs): Economy-driven Innovation, Resilient Communities, and Managing the Global Commons. Our assessment shows that the SDPs align sufficient food supply with progress towards planetary integrity, halting biodiversity loss, mitigating adverse impacts from irrigation, and significantly reducing nitrogen pollution. While all SDPs comply with the Paris climate target, they diverge in the timing of climate mitigation efforts and focus on different greenhouse gases and emission sources. The Economy-driven Innovation pathway rapidly achieves net-negative CO 2 emissions from the land system, whereas the pathways Resilient Communities and Managing the Global Commons significantly decrease agricultural non-CO 2 emissions. Moreover, sustainability interventions attenuate trade-offs associated with narrowly focused mitigation scenarios and reduce reliance on carbon dioxide removal strategies like bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.
ISSN:1748-9326
1748-9326
DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ad8f46