The role of clinical and laboratory finding in the differential diagnosis of hantavirus and leptospirosis infections
Background & objectives:Hantavirus and leptospirosis infections are zoonotic diseases with similar clinical and laboratory findings. The aim of this study is to identify the distinguishing features of these two diseases, for which a definitive diagnosis can take a long time.Methods:Between Septe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vector borne diseases 2024-10, Vol.61 (4), p.601-606 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background & objectives:Hantavirus and leptospirosis infections are zoonotic diseases with similar clinical and laboratory findings. The aim of this study is to identify the distinguishing features of these two diseases, for which a definitive diagnosis can take a long time.Methods:Between September 2021 and June 2023, a total of 45 patients who were admitted to our hospital and were diagnosed with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) or leptospirosis were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were compared in terms of demographic data, clinical, and laboratory parameters. The role of these variables in predicting HFRS or leptospirosis was investigated. The two diseases were compared with regard to outcomes. Receiver operating characteristics were employed for the calculation of cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for parameters showing significant differences. A statistical significance level of p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0972-9062 |
DOI: | 10.4103/0972-9062.392256 |