The administration of GnRH and HCG: double trigger vs HCG alone for follicular oocyte maturation in poor IVF responders—a randomized controlled trial

Background In vitro fertilization (IVF) has revolutionized human reproduction. Originally designed to assist couples who are unable to conceive, the clinical applications of IVF have significantly broadened to encompass many medical and genetic disorders, as well as fertility maintenance. The poor o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2024-12, Vol.29 (1), p.52-8, Article 52
Hauptverfasser: Farouk, Dalia, Hawas, Heba M., Shaban, Mona M., Mekhimer, Mohamed I., Sheeba, Mamdouh, Nabil, Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In vitro fertilization (IVF) has revolutionized human reproduction. Originally designed to assist couples who are unable to conceive, the clinical applications of IVF have significantly broadened to encompass many medical and genetic disorders, as well as fertility maintenance. The poor ovarian response is a very challenging issue in the field of infertility, “double triggering” combines a single bolus of gonadotropic releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist with a standard dosage of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) at the time of triggering has been proposed that it improves the outcomes in poor responders. Methods To study this effect, 73 POR patients received 10,000 units of HCG plus 0.2 mg of GnRH-agonist for ovulation triggering (study group) after induction of ovulation using antagonist protocol, while other 73 POR patients received standard dosage of HCG trigger (10,000 units of HCG) (control group) after the same IOO settings. Results Our results showed that the study group had a higher number of retrieved Metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and number of embryos obtained, than the control group. This difference was statistically significant ( P -value 
ISSN:2090-3251
1110-5690
2090-3251
DOI:10.1186/s43043-024-00211-8