Deficient Processing and Activity of Type I Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor in the Furin-Deficient LoVo-C5 Cells

Abstract To investigate endoproteolytic processing of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR), we have examined its structure and activity in the furin-deficient LoVo-C5 cell line. Immunoprecipitation experiments using the monoclonal anti-IGF-IR antibody (α-IR3) showed that LoVo-C5 c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrinology (Philadelphia) 1998-09, Vol.139 (9), p.3763-3771
Hauptverfasser: Lehmann, Maxime, André, Frédéric, Bellan, Catherine, Remacle-Bonnet, Maryse, Garrouste, Francoise, Parat, Fabrice, Lissitsky, Jean-Claude, Marvaldi, Jacques, Pommier, Gilbert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract To investigate endoproteolytic processing of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR), we have examined its structure and activity in the furin-deficient LoVo-C5 cell line. Immunoprecipitation experiments using the monoclonal anti-IGF-IR antibody (α-IR3) showed that LoVo-C5 cells expressed a major high molecular mass receptor (200 kDa) corresponding to the unprocessed α/β pro-receptor. A small amount of successfully cleaved α/β heterodimers was also produced, indicating a residual endoproteolytic cleavage activity in these cells. In vitro, a soluble form of recombinant furin was able to cleave the pro-IGF-IR (200 kDa) into α-subunit (130 kDa) andβ -subunit (97 kDa). Measurement of IGF binding parameters in LoVo-C5 cells indicated a low number of typical type I IGF-binding sites (binding capacity, 5 × 103 sites/cell; Kd, 1.9 nm for IGF-I and 7.0 nm for IGF-II). These findings in LoVo-C5 contrast with those in HT29-D4 cells, which have active furin, and where IGF-IR (2.8 × 104 sites/cell) was fully processed. Moreover, the 200-kDa pro-IGF-IR of LoVo-C5 was unable to induce intracellular signaling, such as β-subunit tyrosine autophosphorylation and insulin-related substrate-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Flow immunocytometry analysis using α-IR3 antibody indicated that LoVo-C5 cells expressed 40% more receptors than HT29-D4 cells, suggesting that in LoVo-C5 cells only the small amount of mature type I IGF-IR binds IGFs with high affinity. To provide evidence for this idea, we showed that mild trypsin treatment of living LoVo-C5 cells partially restored α/β cleavage of IGF-IR, and greatly enhanced (6-fold) the IGF-I binding capacity of LoVo-C5 cells, but did not restore IGF-IR signaling activity. Moreover, LoVo-C5 cells were totally unresponsive to IGF-I in terms of cell migration, in contrast to fully processed IGF-IR-HT29-D4 cells. Our data indicate that furin is involved in the endoproteolytic processing of the IGF-IR and suggest that this posttranslational event might be crucial for its ligand binding and signaling activities. However, our data do not exclude that other proprotein convertases could participate to IGF-IR maturation.
ISSN:0013-7227
1945-7170
DOI:10.1210/endo.139.9.6184