Behavior of laminated timber portal frames reinforced with fiber-reinforced plastic laminates under cyclic lateral load

This study aimed to enhance the structural performance of a drift joint with a slotted-in steel plate using laminated timber made from small- to medium-diameter timbers. An analysis was conducted to compare and evaluate the structural performance and seismic behavior of laminated timber portal frame...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresources 2024-11, Vol.19 (4), p.8739-8757
Hauptverfasser: Song, Yo-Jin, Baek, Seong-Yeob, Kim, Hyun-Woo, Hong, Soon-Il
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to enhance the structural performance of a drift joint with a slotted-in steel plate using laminated timber made from small- to medium-diameter timbers. An analysis was conducted to compare and evaluate the structural performance and seismic behavior of laminated timber portal frames reinforced with fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) laminates, such as glass fiber cloth (GFC), glass fiber reinforced plastic sheet (GS), and carbon-reinforced plastic sheet (CS), under low amplitude cyclic lateral loads, in comparison to unreinforced portal frames (UR). The reinforced portal frame, strengthened by FRP laminates, exhibited higher resistance to strength and stiffness strength degradation due to cyclic loading-induced degradation at low drift angles compared to the unreinforced frame affected by heterogeneous timber. The reinforced portal frame, particularly the GFC and GS, exhibited energy dissipation rates 32% and 17% higher than UR, respectively, making them the most effective in vibration damping. FRP laminates mitigated fiber direction cleavage from drift pin holes. The average maximum moment and average yield moment of the reinforced portal frame increased by 18% and 21%, respectively, due to the alleviation of joint failure. Finally, CS significantly affected the maximum moment, while GFC significantly influenced the yield moment.
ISSN:1930-2126
1930-2126
DOI:10.15376/biores.19.4.8739-8757