Spectroscopic Study of Heating Distributions and Mechanisms Using Hinode/EIS

Heating distributions along coronal loops are obtained from spectroscopic data with the Hinode/EUV Imaging Spectrometer. The loop half-lengths L half are in the range of 24–107 Mm for our analysis of 18 loops. By using the analytical approximations to 1D hydrostatic numerical calculations of electro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2024-11, Vol.975 (2), p.289
Hauptverfasser: Ishigami, Shun, Hara, Hirohisa, Oba, Takayoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Heating distributions along coronal loops are obtained from spectroscopic data with the Hinode/EUV Imaging Spectrometer. The loop half-lengths L half are in the range of 24–107 Mm for our analysis of 18 loops. By using the analytical approximations to 1D hydrostatic numerical calculations of electron temperature T e ( s ) and density distributions n e ( s ) along a loop, the heating distribution that decreases with a heating scale height s H toward the loop top with a heating rate E 0 at the height of the transition region is estimated by applying a Bayesian analysis to the observed T e ( s ) and n e ( s ) derived by emission line ratios. We obtain s H = 10 ± 4 Mm increasing with L half , E 0 = 10 −2.0±0.5 erg cm −3 s −1 decreasing with L half , and the heating flux F H = 10 7.0±0.4 erg cm −2 s −1 . These loops show s H / L half = 0.21 ± 0.07, suggesting the concentration of the heating near the lower part. Compared to the previous study using imaging data, s H is comparable, while E 0 and F H are about an order of magnitude larger. We find that using the imaging data leads to the underestimation of the electron density and consequently the underestimation of E 0 and F H . We examine heating mechanisms using the power-law relation for F H , the field strength B base and L half : F H ∝ B base β L half λ . We find β = 1.04 − 0.36 + 0.18 and λ = − 0.99 − 0.05 + 0.04 , which show that the reconnection heating model is the most plausible.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7def