Goals of Care Discussions Among Patients Who Suffer Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest remain poor despite advances in resuscitation techniques. Establishing “goals of care” is crucial to optimizing patient care and avoiding burdensome interventions in those who are unlikely to benefit from resuscitation. Doctors often avoid discussions regarding ‘goals of care’ with patients in whom cardiac arrest is not deemed likely at the time of admission. Methods All cardiac arrest team activations for non-pregnant, adult inpatients on medical and surgical wards at our institution from December 2022 – June 2023 were prospectively analysed. Qualitative analysis of inpatient charts was performed to assess; incidence of cardiac arrest, demographic and clinical data, and the degree to which discussions regarding escalation of care had taken place. Results 66 cardiac arrest team activations were screened, of which 23 calls were included for analysis. The estimated incidence of cardiac arrest was 1.11-1.67 events per 1,000 patient discharges. 18 patients (78.2%) were under the care of general medicine or geriatric teams at the time of arrest call. 12 (52%) patients were older than 70 and 4 (17%) were older than 80. Falls were the most common reason for admission (22.7%) among patients for whom the cardiac arrest team was activated. 2 patients (12.5%) with confirmed cardiac arrest survived to hospital discharge. Discussions regarding goals of care were documented for 8/23 patients (34.7%). Conclusion Cardiac arrests were uncommon in our institution. Discussions regarding goals of care were documented in only a third of cases, possibly because many patients presented with issues not typically associated with a risk of subsequent arrest. Given the low survival rates to discharge, routine discussion of goals of care should be considered at the point of admission in all patients who are unlikely to benefit from resuscitation, regardless of the presenting complaint.