Comparison of Response First Technique with Reversal First Technique for Quality of Extubation in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Early and smooth extubation following anesthesia is an important concern in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery to permit early neurological evaluation and prevent complications. The aim was to compare the RESPONSE FIRST and REVERSAL FIRST techniques for quality of extubation (QOE) in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Fifty-six patients aged 18-60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Statuses I-II, and undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors were randomized into either the RESPONSE FIRST group, in which neuromuscular reversal was given following the patient's response to oral commands, or the REVERSAL FIRST group, in which reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) was given at the return of spontaneous respiration. QOE was the primary outcome. Hemodynamic response, jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjVO2), time to extubation, and awareness during emergence were assessed as secondary outcomes. The QOE in the RESPONSE FIRST group was significantly better than the REVERSAL FIRST group (mean (interquartile range (IQR)), 18 (17-19) vs 14 (12-14.75), P < 0.001). Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were better in the RESPONSE FIRST group when compared to the REVERSAL FIRST group at the time of extubation, at 5 minutes, and 15 minutes following extubation (P < 0.05). SjVO2values were higher in the REVERSAL FIRST group as compared to the RESPONSE FIRST group during extubation and at 5 minutes after extubation (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the time to extubation between the groups (P = 0.73). The RESPONSE FIRST technique is associated with better QOE and preservation of systemic and cerebral hemodynamics during extubation in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery when compared to the REVERSAL FIRST technique.