Analyzing the radiation effect on human body with improved SAR using 33 dipole array antenna comparing with 55 dipole array antenna

This study compares the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of a 5*5 dipole array antenna with that of a brand new 3*3 dipole array antenna in an effort to learn how various kinds of dipole array antennas impact live organisms. Approach and Materials: Two groups were sampled for the purpose of statistical analysis. Two different sets of people contributed forty samples. A 5X5 dipole array antenna was used by Group 1, whereas an Innovative 3*3 dipole arrays were employed by Group 2. Researchers used an enhanced body. The forty-person sample consisted of twenty from Group 1 and twenty from Group 2. When utilizing G-power 0.8, the calculations were done using a 95% confidence interval, alpha = 0.05, and beta = 0.2. With an enhanced Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and a 3*3 dipole array antenna, researchers may analyze radiation impacts on the human body with a sample size of 20. A 5*a 5 dipole array antenna may likewise be effectively used with twenty samples. According to the findings, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of the 3*3 dipole array antenna is 0.5935% more than that of the 5*5 dipole array antenna, which is 0.4188. The research could be legitimate if the p-value is less than 0.05, which is 0.0300. If you want to know how radiation affects living things, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) shows that 3*3 dipole array antennas are better than 5*5 dipole arrays.